<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>2008 Vintage Port Review</title>
		<description>Discuss 2008 Vintage Port Review</description>
		<link>http://www.fortheloveofport.com/vintage-port-forecasts/2008-vintage-port-review</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:59:04 --800</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fortheloveofport.com/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/489/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ray Barnes says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fortheloveofport.com/vintage-port-forecasts/2008-vintage-port-review#comment-11</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That is quite amazing to see a SQVP get a classic score (perhaps albeit somewhat preliminary). I will have to keep an eye out for the Fonseca Guimaraeans. As usual, an excellent, well presented article. Thank you Roy!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ray Barnes</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:52:30 --800</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fortheloveofport.com/vintage-port-forecasts/2008-vintage-port-review#comment-11</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
