Interesting, as I've always loved Port, but have only had an interest in other wines relatively recently, the last decade or so.syvmn wrote: I have really enjoyed port, but never really enjoyed wine. I suppose that is a bit misleading as port is wine, but to me they are very different animals.
Search found 128 matches
- Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:20 am
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: Warre's Warrior
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1358
- Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:11 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: Do you prefer Fonseca to Taylor
- Replies: 22
- Views: 3141
- Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:33 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: Have you purchased any 2004 VPs yet?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 3232
- Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:08 am
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: To me, Love me
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1359
- Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:15 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: what age do you prefer to drink port??
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2024
I prefer drinking Vintage Port at age 45, which currently my only choice. After Aug 4th though, my birthday, I'll be drinking them at age 46! Hope to be drinking them at age 90 too, in 2052 :P In terms of the age of the Port, I'm ll over the map, although about 30-35 years old seems to be the sweet ...
- Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:57 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: Taylor 1997 v. Graham's 1985
- Replies: 9
- Views: 984
I opened a 1/2 of taylor 97 maybe 6 months ago. Lovely, although mostly closed. Great promise. Not remotely close to being ready to drink, forget about mature! I'm not touching another for 10+ years! That said, the Grahams 85 IS drinking well, although there is no hurry to drink it up remotely. So, ...
- Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:27 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: What % of your wine cellar is Port?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3592
- Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:28 pm
- Forum: Port Tasting Notes
- Topic: Event: Happy birthday Roy
- Replies: 52
- Views: 9131
Happy Roy Day! I've had the Maury - gave it 89 points but too sweet for more than a glass or two or maybe three . . . The house Maury is now a 28 whatever you call it when they keep adding stuff to the mix, Solera or Sombrero or . . . Seriously, happy birthday Roy. As we say in Greek, Na ta katostes...
- Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:55 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: 1983 vs. 1985 Vintage Ports
- Replies: 22
- Views: 3167
I've had the 83 and 85 Fonseca and Grahams side by side now. The 83 Grahams is fantastic, but the 85 blows it away. The 83 Fonseca is not nearly as good as the 83 Grahams, maybe 91/92 points, and the 85 Fonseca blows it away by a big margin (and the 80 Fonseca simply sucks big time as a VP)!. Dow is...
- Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:18 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: 2004 VPs - when?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 314
2004 VPs - when?
2004 is a birth year, hopefully the last until grandchildren arrive, so I'm looking forward to a few cases of 2004 VPs. Some for their earlier drinking nature, and some to pop at 20 and 30+ years of age. Any idea of when we might see these appearing in the US? I get the impression we're still floode...
- Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:10 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: 1985 Grahams
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1516
I've drank a fair bit of this too and love it, however it seems relatively primary to me compared to the 70 for example (which I didn't try in its youth). I think it's got a long way to go and will evolve. I'll probably like it better older, but it's a question of preference. I think it's still a ba...
- Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:55 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: It's Official !!!
- Replies: 18
- Views: 1968
- Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:17 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: Frustrations of being born in 63.
- Replies: 53
- Views: 5853
And for 61 babies
I was born in 1961. No VP, although the 61 Colheita from Krohn is tasty. My problem with 61 is I'll never buy the big name Bordeaux, because I can get so MUCH more excellent VP for the price. OK, maybe never. I always have a "get rich slow" scheme going - the "get rich quick" doe...
- Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:09 am
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: Just thought you guys might get a small laugh out of this
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2997
- Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:12 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: Comparative Vintages: 2000 vs. 2003
- Replies: 17
- Views: 4296
Great dialog! As 2000 was the birthyear for #1 son (hmmm, I sound like Charlie Chan!) I bought but did not taste. As 2003 wasn't a birthyear, and suddenly I felt much older, I did taste and liked what I tasted. Wish I had tasted 2000! Lesson learned -- try everything young, especially as there is no...
- Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:15 pm
- Forum: Port Tasting Notes
- Topic: 1977 Dow Vintage Port
- Replies: 3
- Views: 807
- Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:21 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: VP: Where to buy in Boston area?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2260
- Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:14 pm
- Forum: Port Tasting Notes
- Topic: 1977 Dow Vintage Port
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1663
- Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:57 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: POLL: Discussion Point
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3837
- Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:03 pm
- Forum: Port Forum
- Topic: The 1991 Vintage
- Replies: 39
- Views: 4738
The Grahams I've had once, and it was good, really good, but not spectacular - 91ish points The Churchill around 89 points from one tasting - quite enjoyable. Dows - a blockbuster! Picked a few more up dirt cheap from Premier Cru a couple of years ago but haven't retried since. So that's what I know