1963 vs 1970

This forum is for discussing all things Port (as in from PORTugal) - vintages, recommendations, tasting notes, etc.

Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil

Post Reply
John Vachon
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Stow, ohio, USA

1963 vs 1970

Post by John Vachon »

This may not be new from me but:

For 40 years I thought 63 was better than 70. But in the last few years my 63's can be great the first

day but after decline. On the other hand 70's can last for several days at a high level.

What are others opinions?
Moses Botbol
Posts: 5923
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
Location: Boston, USA

Re: 1963 vs 1970

Post by Moses Botbol »

Mean quality level of 1970 ports was higher than 1963 as whole. You'll be hard pressed to find a producer whose 1970 vintage wasn't at least good-to-great. I had Dow, Croft, and Graham within last year from both vintages (individually on separate occasion's). I seem to think '63 had a smoother spirit... Both held up equally well. At this point it fair to start to nitpicking actual bottles rather than the vintage.

Provenance becomes more an issue as the years go by. Most are not going to have bottles sourced from the same original cellar of both vintages [cheers.gif]
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16613
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1963 vs 1970

Post by Andy Velebil »

Moses Botbol wrote: Provenance becomes more an issue as the years go by. [cheers.gif]
+1
At 51 years of age the 1963's mostly are now on the slow downhill slide with a handful of the top ones still on a plateau. But the same can now be said of most 1970's, with the addition of a few that are still on the upswing. Overall, I would probably say that 1970 did see much better VP's from companies that traditionally, at that time, didn't make long lived VP's. As the joke goes, "If you couldn't make a decent VP in 1970 you shouldn't be making Port." But coming up on 45 years old the 1970's are reaching their life span for most of them and it's time to start drinking up the majority of them, leaving that top handful to continue to very gracefully slide further into old age.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Poyee K
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:55 am
Location: Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Re: 1963 vs 1970

Post by Poyee K »

1963 Dow's still drinking very well and not in any respect on downside. I was lucky enough to have sampled this vintage from more than one bottle from a wonderful wine society:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/147648174@N08/?

I liked this kind of vintage port -- elegant, balanced, robust and not "in your face". Developed and beautiful. Developed flavors unfolding on one's palate. Lovely. [cheers.gif]

As seen from pics, decanted just after opening and then served within 1/2 hour or so thereafter. Not sure if that was necessary but it showed well.

Roy's 2010 tasting note:
"Very light ruby with a light pink-tawny meniscus. Tight initially with minty, cocoa, cedar and strawberry aromas. This exhibited the biggest, richest and roundest palate of Dow's troika of VPs. The tannins are still alive and refined; texturally this is a beauty with sumptuous elegance. Massive, dense, voluptuous and with great purity. One of the best bottles of 1963 Dow I've tasted. Bottles of this quality will provide immense pleasure at 65 years of age if not more. An awesome not-yet-fully-mature VP nearing 50!
Scoe: 96+"
User avatar
Tom Archer
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:09 pm
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: 1963 vs 1970

Post by Tom Archer »

I have seen no real evidence of '70s going over the hill, other than through poor cellarage. Some have plateaued and others still have a little more to offer. Several 63s on the other hand, have been showing signs of tiring for over a decade now. Most '66s are likely to outlive both of their adjoining vintages however, and the '60s are frequently showing better now than their counterparts from '63.
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21427
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Sammamish, WA
Contact:

Re: 1963 vs 1970

Post by Roy Hersh »

I agree with both Andy and Tom and Moses.

Provenance is EVERYTHING with old VP.

Buying them on the cheap, often times coming from less advantageous provenance, is the number one reason for opening disappointing bottles from 1970, which may present qualities that seem past their prime. Sure, there are certainly a few that have not survived to this point in time, but that is a rarity in my experience and typically from 3rd tier shippers.

I find the majority of 1970 VPs that I encounter are still in their prime to mature/plateau drinking window. Still, there are a solid number of 1970s that are in a GREAT place in their lives, with 1-3 decades of fine drinking ahead of them (depending on the producer of course). IF I was buying a single mixed case from any vintage between 1955 and 1977, to drink over the next couple of decades, it would definitely be 1970 at this point. 1966 possibly would be even more in line with my palate preference ... but that would be because I narrowed my selection process further than I would have to do when considering which VPs to buy from 1970.

For 1966s, which while the top eight to ten are currently in a fabulous and extraordinary realm in terms of their aging curve; many others are fully mature. 1963s ... even more so and with a smaller bandwidth than either of the aforementioned vintages. As Tom mentioned, I find some of the1960 VPs to be in a great place evolution wise; holding up seemingly better as a % of total bottles from this vintage, that cross my palate. Admittedly, the number of 1960s that I have consumed in the past half decade seems to be shrinking, due to their greater scarcity here in the USA. Fortunately, when they do emerge from cellars, most have been really special and nearly always, pleasurable at the very least.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Svein CE
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 6:07 am
Location: Vraadal, Norway

Re: 1963 vs 1970

Post by Svein CE »

What do you mean by provenance?
Surely all bottles from the same producer, from the same vintage, has the same provenance.
ie come from the same place of origin.
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16613
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1963 vs 1970

Post by Andy Velebil »

Svein CE wrote:What do you mean by provenance?
.
It means how it has been stored since being bottled.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Post Reply