- 1991 Dow Porto Late Bottled Vintage - Portugal, Douro, Porto (2/16/2014)
Popped and poured. A decent amount of sediment upon decanting. Brownish red in color. Palate of plums, pomegranate, and cassis, with only a little alcohol heat that quickly dissipated. Unmistakable Dow dryness with at best medium sweetness. Very interesting for what it is, a 23 year old LBV that is usually consumed with a couple of years of bottling (in this case, 1997). It's a very pleasant drink. It would be fun to do a side-by-side with the 1991 Dow vintage port, which I'll do someday soon. (88 pts.)
1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil
- John Danza
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:10 pm
- Location: Naperville, Illinois, United States of America - USA
1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
-
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:19 am
- Location: Texas, USA
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
Very interesting, thanks for the note! Interesting as well that this was bottled after 6, not just 4, years.
-
- Posts: 6031
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
Pretty sure they filtered their LBV back then.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
- John Danza
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:10 pm
- Location: Naperville, Illinois, United States of America - USA
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
Yes, probably so although the back label had no statement about it. This threw some fine sediment along with three or four large (quarter sized) purple flakes that you usually get in a VP.Moses Botbol wrote:Pretty sure they filtered their LBV back then.
- Glenn E.
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
Yeah, filtered usually isn't mentioned on the label. These days filtered is the standard and unfiltered is the cool kid on the block that deserves special mention on the label. I suspect that was true for 1991 LBVs as well, but don't know for certain. (The cool kid back then might have been called "Tradicional" on the label instead of unfiltered... I don't recall when the various label changes occurred with that notation.)John Danza wrote:Yes, probably so although the back label had no statement about it. This threw some fine sediment along with three or four large (quarter sized) purple flakes that you usually get in a VP.Moses Botbol wrote:Pretty sure they filtered their LBV back then.
Glenn Elliott
- John Danza
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:10 pm
- Location: Naperville, Illinois, United States of America - USA
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
Day 2 showed noticeable improvement, with the nose coming on and the palate showing more fruit. The sweetness is coming on a little more. The color has also taken on a bit more red. Overall, quite unexpected and pleasing.
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
So with an initial 88 points, where did you wind up after day 2, John?
Glenn is correct that back at the time of bottling in 1997, Traditional or Tradicional was the norm. Nobody really used Unfiltered back then, that I am aware of.
Glenn is correct that back at the time of bottling in 1997, Traditional or Tradicional was the norm. Nobody really used Unfiltered back then, that I am aware of.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
- John Danza
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:10 pm
- Location: Naperville, Illinois, United States of America - USA
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
I'm probably at 90. I was really surprised that it took on some weight and complexity. This somewhat long-term experiment with LBVs is going to be fun. I have two 1992 Dow LBVs and a 1994 Dow LBV as well. I'll need to open all three for a mini-vertical sometime soon.Roy Hersh wrote:So with an initial 88 points, where did you wind up after day 2, John?
- Andy Velebil
- Posts: 16808
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
Was it sealed with a driven cork or a t-cork?
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
- John Danza
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:10 pm
- Location: Naperville, Illinois, United States of America - USA
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
It's a T-cork Andy. Photo below. As you can see, the bottom quarter inch was a deep purple, but there wasn't any wine past that. The cork held very tightly. At first I thought it was going to break on me, but then it came out. I'm not sure what the branding is.Andy Velebil wrote:Was it sealed with a driven cork or a t-cork?

- Andy Velebil
- Posts: 16808
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1991 Dow Late Bottled Vintage
I would guess this was probably filtered due to the t-cork. Though lightly filtered and not cold-stabilized if through some sediment.
And has anyone else noticed how dark t-corks get stained where the Port touches it, compared to regular driven corks? I wonder why the color difference?....Hmm', time to post that as a separate question.
And has anyone else noticed how dark t-corks get stained where the Port touches it, compared to regular driven corks? I wonder why the color difference?....Hmm', time to post that as a separate question.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com