Multi: 1955 Graham, 1966 Fonseca, 1963 Dow & Cockburn, '97 Warr

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
Julian D. A. Wiseman
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 7:54 pm
Location: London, United Kingdom
Contact:

Multi: 1955 Graham, 1966 Fonseca, 1963 Dow & Cockburn, '97 Warr

Post by Julian D. A. Wiseman »

Taken by Amtrak to Boston’s South Station on Saturday 14th July 2007, I was collected by Sean C. and Moses Botbol and taken to the home of the former. They had decanted Graham 1955, Fonseca 1966, Warre 1977, there was a half bottle of Ramos Pinto 1985, and I had brought Cockburn 1963 and Dow 1963, as well as a pair of vintage-1999 Partagas Lusitanias. Neither a horizontal, nor a vertical, nor a diagonal: just an evening of drinking vintage port and smoking cigars.

But before that their guest started complaining. We cannot do such an evening with two glasses each, occasionally rinsing them to switch beverage! My host (SC) was marched off to Crate and Barrel, wherein he purchased two dozen of their small wine glasses. Via a pizza, we returned to wash and use the new glasses.

Readers will understand my pausing to admire the fridge-size humidor, and—even better—the wine-fridge full of pre-Great War bottles. Very fine.

So, to the notes taken between 7pm and 8½pm-ish.


Graham 1955
From the fine cellars of Sean C., and decanted at 13:30. A perfect colour, lightly brown at the edge and the centre a glorious red. Mixed berries to the nose, no one that I could separately distinguish. To the palate very soft—perfectly aged—and very long. Again mixed berries, and very very long. A great port, and one of the best few I have sampled this year. UncleTomScore = 9-8.
Image


Fonseca 1966
Also from the collection of Sean C., and also decanted at 13:30. Brown-red at centre, perhaps brick-red, though noticeably paler than the G55. Despite being eleven years younger, it looks half a decade older (which probably says more about the Graham). The nose revealed different things at different times to different people, I initially finding white chocolate, then MB locating—to general agreement—caramel, and SC—with MB concurring—maple. The palate was like the nose (white chocolate again for me), though with a slight roughness, which might perhaps have been imperfect decanting. UncleTomScore = 7-6.
Image


Dow 1963
Both the Dow and the Cockburn were part of a mixed lot of port bought by jdaw1 at auction in New York in December 2005, and were decanted at about 5pm. Slightly cloudy, and paler than the previous two bottles; red-brown. Huge alcohol nose, behind the ethanol being lychee. The mouthfeel very heavy, smooth and viscous, with a taste—perhaps the finishing taste—being banana! The finish alas short-to-medium in length, and lacking in weight (“thin”, said somebody). UncleTomScore = 6-5.
Image


Cockburn 1963
Part of the same mixed lot as the Dow, bought 1½ years previously by jdaw1. Decanted at about 5pm. Pale, brown throughout, and slightly cloudy. To the nose brown sugar, “musty” said MB. Maybe lightly-cooked sugar. (Madeira? Oxidisation? Maybe.) The same to taste: maraschino cherry (agreeing with my opinion after the Cockburn vertical held in March 2007), and predominantly sugar. Disappointing: UncleTomScore = 4-4.
Image


Warre 1977
From the Boston collection of Moses Botbol, and decanted at 11:00. Pink! The colour was pink. And the nose of spearmint, with SC—who is presumably more expert in this matter than me—saying “Wrigley”. In the mouth lightly sugary, a mint ending, and good length. Great value for $70! UncleTomScore = 6-6 (though in a head-to-head now, everybody preferred the Dow 1963).
Image


Ramos Pinto 1985
Moses Botbol had opened this bottle a week previously, put half of it into a half-bottle which had been stored in his wine fridge (hence the absence of bottle from picture). Dark purple: not black, but with much more blue and dark than a simple red. The nose slightly off: cheddar, or a Burgundy-style cheese nose, and alcohol. To taste peppery, viscous, heavy, though a short ending. Nothing like as good a bottle as that consumed in March 2007, nor that enjoyed in June 2007. A week is too long a decanting time.
Image



Later in the evening I was given a Montecristo A: a very fine cigar, extremely smooth, and long (9½″). A great smoke, but I think that my preference is for something a little shorter with more bite.

Individual TN threads: 1955 Graham; 1966 Fonseca; 1963 Dow; 1963 Cockburn; 1977 Warre; 1985 Ramos Pinto.
Last edited by Julian D. A. Wiseman on Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
SEAN C.
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Brooklyn,, New York, United States of America - USA

Post by SEAN C. »

Excellent review Julian! The glasses of course were essential, having only 8 Reidel's to go around was a slight problem. I didn't even think about glasses because I don't usually have six bottles to deal with. Thankfully Crate and Barrel saved the day and now that I have 32 Port glasses future tastings will run smoothly. :lol:
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21848
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Post by Roy Hersh »

Wow, what a great post! Thanks Julian. Glad to see there are some FTLOP offlines taking place in other parts of the USA.

Now if only people had a clue as to what an uncle tom score meant, that would be helpful. I am sure many of the new folks are wondering what that means. Care to explain in terms of the generally accepted standard that we can understand? 100 points, or even the less familiar 20 point scale ... rather than something that less than 10 ppl in the world utilize. :roll: :lol:

In all seriousness, it sounds like you guys had a fantastic tasting of some very interesting older Vintage Ports. Well done gents!
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16827
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Post by Andy Velebil »

Great notes and good to see others using Port Tongs. I just aquired a new pair of stainless steel ones from a fellow Port lover who refuses to post online.....come on Dan :wink: :lol: :lol:
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Julian D. A. Wiseman
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 7:54 pm
Location: London, United Kingdom
Contact:

UncleTomScore

Post by Julian D. A. Wiseman »

UncleTomScore is A/B, where A is the score out of 10 now, and B is the estimate of how good it will be in a decade.
Post Reply