Will it keep e.g. for 15 years? And if so, how would it most likely have changed compared to drinking it within the first couple of years after bottling?
Thanks
Andreas
![Toast [cheers.gif]](./images/smilies/cheers.gif)
Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil
We will have to agree to disagreeGlenn E. wrote:I wouldn't use words like "flat" and "simple" to describe what happens because neither is completely accurate. .
While I'm not a chemist, I don't think we can claim that nothing chemically has changed with respect to the acid over time. Some acids can react with glass, but probably not those in wine. Acids can react with air and oxygen, and with a corked bottle and enough time, there probably will be some of this. My quick googling suggests that some acids will mellow (higher pH), and some acidic solutions can actually become stronger. Now we need a chemist to tell us what can happen to those particular acids in wine.Glenn E. wrote:The acidity is still there - chemically nothing has changed - but the way it is perceived changes over time.
While all true in general, I doubt much of that applies to a wine that's been in what's essentially a large oak decanter for 30, 40, or 80+ years. Any oxygen-derived changes that are going to happen to the acidity are going to happen in barrel on an old Colheita... once you put it in glass it's going to be pretty stable for a very long time. Certainly longer than the 5-10 years that some claim causes a bottled tawny to degrade.Eric Menchen wrote:While I'm not a chemist, I don't think we can claim that nothing chemically has changed with respect to the acid over time. Some acids can react with glass, but probably not those in wine. Acids can react with air and oxygen, and with a corked bottle and enough time, there probably will be some of this. My quick googling suggests that some acids will mellow (higher pH), and some acidic solutions can actually become stronger. Now we need a chemist to tell us what can happen to those particular acids in wine.Glenn E. wrote:The acidity is still there - chemically nothing has changed - but the way it is perceived changes over time.
First of all, I don't know that we can (or should) describe a TWAIOA (Tawny with an indication of age) and a Colheita the same way in discussions of acidity, in either. Glenn makes an important point to clarify that difference. But let me add a little comparison here.While all true in general, I doubt much of that applies to a wine that's been in what's essentially a large oak decanter for 30, 40, or 80+ years. Any oxygen-derived changes that are going to happen to the acidity are going to happen in barrel on an old Colheita... once you put it in glass it's going to be pretty stable for a very long time. Certainly longer than the 5-10 years that some claim causes a bottled tawny to degrade.
In these type of bottles where a TWAIOA, is cellared properly for a lot longer than the original producer ever intended, and then is consumed, there will certainly be a smoother and more dense mouthfeel. But like Andy mentioned, due to how the acidity melds into this dynamic of a wood-aged blended Tawny that has aged for decades beyond what was "intended", for my palate as well, the freshness is lost and while he mentioned "flat" my word would be "tired". Nonetheless, I had a Port exactly like this very recently, with 23 years of bottle age (1996 bottling) and it was the 20 Year Old (Single Quinta, Bom Retiro) Tawny by Ramos Pinto. It was extremely interesting and I actually enjoyed it quite a bit. But I did comment to others at the table that it seemed tired and that was when the date on this bottle was then checked. I wasn't surprised. But as Glenn alluded to in his comments on his last post, blind, we all can make the mistake in either direction.We've been told that you're supposed to drink a tawny as close to its bottling date as possible so that it won't degrade, so that's what people do and what they believe you should do.
Here we are, arguing about the chemistry of wine aging in glass and oak when the academic experts in the field acknowledge they don't know exactly what's going on!![]()
The problem with academic experts in any field is their extreme reluctance to engage in any form of research work that takes longer than a Phd course to complete.Eric Ifune wrote:Here we are, arguing about the chemistry of wine aging in glass and oak when the academic experts in the field acknowledge they don't know exactly what's going on!![]()
Yep. Also, IIRC, Niepoort's Garrafeiras are put into demijohn relatively quickly. Isn't it something like 7 years? My comments were about wood-aged Ports that have 30, 40, or even 80+ years in wood and so should be much more stable at the time they are bottled than Niepoort's Garrafeiras are when they're put in demijohn.Roy Hersh wrote:Niepoort Garrafeira is where Glenn's quote is not 100% accurate, but he was really talking about typical glass wine bottles, not demijohns where there is definitely a significant perceived change in the acidity within those special hand-blown glass vessels. But now we are getting into serious geek territory. Again, I do realize Glenn was talking about wine bottles when he mentioned "glass."
No, not at all! Niepoort's Colheitas are some of the ones we mostly agree will age nicely in bottle. Dirk Niepoort is a firm believer that Colheitas (his in particular) can age well and even improve in bottle, so your '34 should be fine. More than fine, really - that's an outstanding bottle of Port.Heather Hathwell wrote:So..... in other words my last bottles of 1934 Niepoort Colheita, bought at auction a dozen years ago and which were amazing then, are now likely toast?
Don't listen to Glenn. Those bottles are toast. Let me know where they are, and I will pick them up and dispose of them for you.Glenn E. wrote:No, not at all! Niepoort's Colheitas are some of the ones we mostly agree will age nicely in bottle. Dirk Niepoort is a firm believer that Colheitas (his in particular) can age well and even improve in bottle, so your '34 should be fine. More than fine, really - that's an outstanding bottle of Port.Heather Hathwell wrote:So..... in other words my last bottles of 1934 Niepoort Colheita, bought at auction a dozen years ago and which were amazing then, are now likely toast?