Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

This forum is for discussing all things Port (as in from PORTugal) - vintages, recommendations, tasting notes, etc.

Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil

Post Reply
Andreas Platt
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: Vienna and Sacramento, AT&US

Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Andreas Platt »

Just purchased a case of '17@55EUR with option on going deeper or adding '16 at same price tag.

Any comparison on those back-to-back years? TNs?

Thanks

Andy
User avatar
Al B.
Posts: 6023
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:06 am
Location: Wokingham, United Kingdom - UK

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Al B. »

I had the chance to try these two vintages side by side (and also the 2015 and 2018) a couple of weeks ago. All four were fabulous Ports but the 2017 was a class above the other three. It really is a stunning Vintage Port.
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8186
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Glenn E. »

Al B. wrote: Fri Oct 16, 2020 3:02 pm I had the chance to try these two vintages side by side (and also the 2015 and 2018) a couple of weeks ago. All four were fabulous Ports but the 2017 was a class above the other three. It really is a stunning Vintage Port.
I don't believe that I've had any of them side-by-side, but I have also tasted all 4 and agree with Alex. The 2017 is in a class by itself out of that group. 55 EUR/bottle is an outstanding price, congrats!
Glenn Elliott
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6393
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Eric Menchen »

And here I was going to buy some 2018. So maybe 2017 instead?
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8186
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Glenn E. »

Eric Menchen wrote: Fri Oct 16, 2020 9:27 pm And here I was going to buy some 2018. So maybe 2017 instead?
So far, speaking of the vintage in general and with limited experience and very limited age in bottle, 2017 doesn't seem to me to be the equal of 2011 or 1970. But it might be the equal of 1994. Just given those comparisons, though, it's in great company.

With even less experience and even less bottle age, 2018 just seems like a solid, quality vintage.
Glenn Elliott
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6393
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Eric Menchen »

Glenn E. wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 2:55 pm So far, speaking of the vintage in general and with limited experience and very limited age in bottle, 2017 doesn't seem to me to be the equal of 2011 or 1970. But it might be the equal of 1994. Just given those comparisons, though, it's in great company.

With even less experience and even less bottle age, 2018 just seems like a solid, quality vintage.
2011 was the last vintage I bought in quantity. I bought a few bottles of 2016, and a little bit of 2015. I was thinking of getting a couple of sixers of 2018, but now I'm considering the 2017 Noval instead.
Mike J. W.
Posts: 1000
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:55 pm
Location: In the middle of cornfields & cow pastures, PA

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Mike J. W. »

The only down side, for me at least is that the Noval usually take so long to really hit their prime. I'm almost 63, I could be dead before the '17 really starts to sing. But I'll buy some anyways. I'll try a few over the years and the rest my kids can sell at auction in 2044, lol.
"I have often thought that the aim of Port is to give you a good and durable hangover, so that during the next day you should be reminded of the splendid occasion the night before." - Hungarian/British journalist & author George Mikes
Paul C. Metman
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:52 am
Location: Zeewolde, Netherlands

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Paul C. Metman »

Mike J. W. wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:56 pm The only down side, for me at least is that the Noval usually take so long to really hit their prime. I'm almost 63, I could be dead before the '17 really starts to sing. But I'll buy some anyways. I'll try a few over the years and the rest my kids can sell at auction in 2044, lol.
Who cares?! I am 78 and purchased a few bottles of the Noval VP '18 as well (after 2015, 2016 and 2017, admittedly: small amounts) There is always time to enjoy them [cheers.gif]
Mike J. W.
Posts: 1000
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:55 pm
Location: In the middle of cornfields & cow pastures, PA

Re: Noval VP 2016 vs. 2017

Post by Mike J. W. »

Paul C. Metman wrote: Fri Oct 23, 2020 2:11 am
Mike J. W. wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:56 pm The only down side, for me at least is that the Noval usually take so long to really hit their prime. I'm almost 63, I could be dead before the '17 really starts to sing. But I'll buy some anyways. I'll try a few over the years and the rest my kids can sell at auction in 2044, lol.
Who cares?! I am 78 and purchased a few bottles of the Noval VP '18 as well (after 2015, 2016 and 2017, admittedly: small amounts) There is always time to enjoy them [cheers.gif]
[cheers.gif] :thumbsup: [cheers.gif]
"I have often thought that the aim of Port is to give you a good and durable hangover, so that during the next day you should be reminded of the splendid occasion the night before." - Hungarian/British journalist & author George Mikes
Post Reply