1985 Burmester Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
David Spriggs
Posts: 2658
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:51 pm
Location: Dana Point, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by David Spriggs »

Medium ruby color. Some significant bricking. A beautiful nose of black cherries, mahogany, and vanilla. Full bodied palate,. This mouthfeel is so suave and viscous. Wow. You just want it to linger in your mouth. Excellent acidity. Outstanding! I have had a lot of 1985 Burmester VPs. So many of have been leaking, poorly stored, etc. But this is the best bottle that I can recall. Just ethereal. 95 points.
Attachments
C91DB760-73AD-42B5-A8AB-CC3AD530370F.jpeg
C91DB760-73AD-42B5-A8AB-CC3AD530370F.jpeg (2.75 MiB) Viewed 4011 times
User avatar
John M.
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Hunterdon County, New Jersey, USA

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by John M. »

Thanks for the note...I have some of these! Very Happy!
Any Port in a storm!
Mike J. W.
Posts: 1218
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:55 pm
Location: In the middle of cornfields & cow pastures, PA

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by Mike J. W. »

Great review. I have 2 (thanks John). I'll have to try one soon.
"I have often thought that the aim of Port is to give you a good and durable hangover, so that during the next day you should be reminded of the splendid occasion the night before." - Hungarian/British journalist & author George Mikes
Will W.
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2015 8:06 am
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by Will W. »

I am a fan of Burmester ports and, indeed, Burmester colheitas. The difficulty I have found with the VPs from the 1980s is that the incidences of cork taint are so frequent that I gave up a while back buying anything bottled in the 1980s.
User avatar
David Spriggs
Posts: 2658
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:51 pm
Location: Dana Point, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by David Spriggs »

Will W. wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:56 pm The difficulty I have found with the VPs from the 1980s is that the incidences of cork taint are so frequent that I gave up a while back buying anything bottled in the 1980s.
I'm not going to disagree with that. I have had many corked 1980's VPs.
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6682
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by Eric Menchen »

I loved this the first time I tried it 2008, so I went out and bought six bottles. Most of those have been disappointing compared to that first experience, which was more like yours here. I have one left, and you give me hope that it might shine.
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8386
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by Glenn E. »

I still have one of these left as well, and it was purchased at the same time as the one we opened in 2015 for the 1985 horizontal. I started out at 90 on that one, but by the time I was done I had lowered it all the way to 86. So I hope my remaining bottle shows more like yours! To be fair, I also noted there was something weird going on with my palate at that tasting, so I'm not too concerned about the remaining bottle.

I thought I'd also had one more recently (during COVID) that I liked better, but I can't find a note for it.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16817
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

Sounds like a lot of bottle variation in this one. Is that a correct assessment of people's encounters with it?
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6682
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by Eric Menchen »

Andy Velebil wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 6:16 pm Sounds like a lot of bottle variation in this one. Is that a correct assessment of people's encounters with it?
Yes, for me at least.
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8386
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by Glenn E. »

Andy Velebil wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 6:16 pm Sounds like a lot of bottle variation in this one. Is that a correct assessment of people's encounters with it?
I used to think it was pretty consistent (just not that great), but now David's TN has me hoping that I've just been unlucky so far! :lol:
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
David Spriggs
Posts: 2658
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:51 pm
Location: Dana Point, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Burmester Vintage Port

Post by David Spriggs »

Andy Velebil wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 6:16 pm Sounds like a lot of bottle variation in this one. Is that a correct assessment of people's encounters with it?
Most definitely. If this one bottle was representative, we would all be talking about it like it's 1994 Vesuvio. Unfortunately it's not.
Post Reply