Eric Menchen wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2023 3:59 pm
Mike J. W. wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 3:24 pm
Which were your Top 3 and the worst 3?
They were tasted blind, and not in the order listed. My favorites were #1, #5, and #6. Least favorites were #11, #15, and #16.
I'll need to get the secret decoder ring from someone else to figure out what those were. As I recall, #1 was Quinta do Vesuvio, and 5 and 6 were not the heavy hitters one would expect.
LOUISSS J wrote:Oh wow! Nice selection! Also how is the 1994 vintage rendered in its evolution?
There were lots of great wines here, with plenty of life in them. Three or so suggested they would be better with even more time. There were a few bad bottles, but I think they were singularly flawed bottles, not an indication that the vintage or that particular brand is on the decline.
I did take notes and will post them after I get the decoder.
1: Vesuvio
2: Smith Woodhouse
3: Churchill
4: Taylor
5: Dow
6: Smith Woodhouse LBV
7: Heitz (California)
8: Quinta do Crasto
9: Niepoort
10: Romariz
11: Burmester
12: Fonseca
13: Warre
14: Graham
15: Delaforce
16: Quinta do Noval
- 2023-05-27 23.01.54.jpg (304.21 KiB) Viewed 2291 times
(picture is in alphabetical order, not service order)
My favorites (best first) were Vesuvio, Smith Woodhouse, Taylor, and Dow. Those 4 were a pretty significant step above all of the others. Others at the table had the Smith Woodhouse first, and for me the difference was only half a point. It was rockin' and I can't argue with anyone who liked it best.
My least favorites (worst first) were Delaforce, Graham, Heitz, and Fonseca.
Yes, you read that right. There was nothing
definably wrong with either the Graham or the Fonseca, but for me they were each about 7 points lower than they should have been at 88 and 90 respectively. The Fonseca was Wine Spectator's #1 wine of 1997, they rated it 100 points at the time, and I gave it 90 in this tasting.
The Heitz is the first time I've ever been fooled by a California "port". I've been tested blind on numerous occasions, but I've always been able to pick out non-Port wines. This time, even with Stewart claiming it wasn't Portuguese, I was almost completely fooled. The only saving grace is that my note does say "not right but also not wrong" so it seems I did think
something was off, but just couldn't complete the throught.
88 points for a Graham. I'm going to go sit in the corner and weep.