This summer (jun 2009) I was part of a group (32) from Denmark (The Danish Port Wine Club est. 1981) that made a visit to Niepoort. Dirk van der Niepoort had arranged a great tasting which - he said - would change our view towards tawny - spooky

First we had the vintage port 2007 - great potential. Estimated 95/96p.
Then we had the following 3 port wines blind:
Niepoort vintage port 1983:
About 50% of the group thought it was tawny!
96p
Niepoort colheita 1981 (bottled 1997):
Most agreed that this was colheita. But that was about all we could agree on. Some even said back from the 1940-1950-1960!
97p
Niepoort 20 years (bottled 1983):
The grand surprise of the evening. What is this? Tawny for sure - but colheita or...? Only 1 person got i right - and only 2 other persons thought it was not a colheita

This port wine was bottled 26 years ago. Many from the group have tasted the Niepoort 20 years (not on bottle for decades) before - and there was no doubt at all - this port wine was different - some kind of development/maturing could not be denied. It had notes from a orange liqueur, thick, raffined, lively - you just wished your glass would never empty

97/98p
Dirk van der Niepoort dislike these common "rules". He likes to prove a different point - to provoke! And he did. He didn't say it directly - but when he said, that he would change our view towards tawny - I think his point was, that tawny actually can "develop/mature" after being bottled.
I must say - I agree - at least I think? This 20 years, bottled 26 years ago, had changed. And it had changed into something very exciting - whether one would call it "development", "maturing" or something else - one must accept - something did "happen" during all these years - and it was good

Best regards
Henrik Lilja
Member of The Danish Port Wine Club est. 1981