A Current Article on LBV

This section is for those who have basics questions about, or are new to, Port. There are no "dumb" questions here - just those wanting to learn more!

Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21829
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

A Current Article on LBV

Post by Roy Hersh »

What do you think of this article on LBV which appeared in yesterday's SF Chronicle?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... &type=wine
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Michael Hann
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:42 am
Location: McKinney, TX, US

Re: A Current Article on LBV

Post by Michael Hann »

I thought it was a reasonably good and informative article, given the length constraints the author was no doubt working within. Nothing stood out as glaringly false or misrepresentative. I liked the tasting notes, particularly for the 2003 Fonseca Unfiltered LBV. I've bought a couple bottles, likely will buy some more, but had not previously seen any tasting notes about this.

Not to be excessively critical -- again, I'm sure the writer was subject to length constraints -- but the distinction between filtered and unfiltered LBV was not pointed out and was not uniformly pointed out in the name of the tasted LBV ports. The 2003 Fonseca LBV, for example, is unfiltered but was not identified as such. The Smith Woodhouse LBV, by contrast, was identified by the author as unfiltered and unfined, which was good. This would be something I would have liked to have seen pointed out, but I appreciate that there is only so many nuances and details you can put into a short article. And on a second read it really was a short article!!! I think that really says it all. So, good article.
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6679
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: A Current Article on LBV

Post by Eric Menchen »

For it's length, I agree that it was nice, and good exposure for Port I think. One problem I've found in the filtered/unfiltered arena is that for a lot of bottles it isn't clear which is the case. I presume if the bottle doesn't say one way or the other that is is filtered, but this could be a bad assumption.
Post Reply