It will be put on my bedside along with my pamphlet about Vargellas that my wife nearly threw away the other day

Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil
Ok Roy, here is a negative. Remember that other thread about not using enough pictures and about using those "Big words"...just kiddingRoy Hersh wrote:Thanks again Stuart.
I have a feeling that only serious Port geeks like us will appreciate it, but who knows.
Anyone else like to chime in, I don't mind negative or positive comments as it is the best way for me to learn what interests the readers.
In my article, I mentioned that inexpensive wines were added to the Port to "bulk up" the volumes due to the shortfall in production. I think I actually mentioned cheap Spanish wines being added, as they were probably the easiest country to supply Portugal back then, not to mention the cheap prices. However, this practice was totally gone during the mid-1750s when Pombal was in power ... and definitely was long gone by the mid-1800s, as was the adulteration with Elderberries etc. So the 1905 researcher probably was reading some very old information at the time. I bet there was no Google at that point. : )Some of it raised my eyebrows (like port coming from Catalonia!?).
This too is obviously misinformation as we know that the fortification process takes place when fermentation reaches a specific level, and NOT after it has been completed.After fermentation the wine is blended and fortified.
To be more accurate, 19-21% is reality.Ports contain from 18 to 25 per cent. of alcohol by volume.
From exhaustive research 1851 followed by 1878 are considered the two greatest pre-phylloxera vintages from what I have studied.1847 (the finest known),