Taking advantage of the wine glut

[Roy Hersh]

Taking Advantage of the Wine Glut
Amid an oversupply, Cameron Hughes buys top wineries' excess and resells it for bargain prices
By LETTIE TEAGUE
There is a glut of wine all over the world—an oversupply so significant that it's compelled Australian winemakers to plow up their vineyards, forced French producers to turn wines into ethanol and brought wealthy Napa vintners if not to their knees then to their bankers in search of refinance. The reasons are various—new vineyard plantings by ambitious producers, increased productivity at a time of plummeting demand, winemakers who have overleveraged their brands.
The bulk wine market—which encompasses everything from wine in the barrel to finished wines in unlabeled bottles, aka "shiners"—may absorb some of this excess but with prices as low as $1 a gallon, it's not going to help winemakers raise very much money, let alone make them rich. Except in the case of Cameron Hughes. Mr. Hughes takes the $100 California Cabernets that have gone begging for buyers and sells the very same wines under his own labels for $25 a bottle and less. He packages them in generic-looking bottles with names like Lot 164 Rutherford Cabernet and Lot 135 Syrah and sells them on his website and to retailers like Sam's Club and Costco in 38 states.
I'd first heard about Mr. Hughes a few months ago when I attended a dinner in Chicago hosted by a prominent wine collector. Almost every wine was a first-growth Bordeaux, grand cru Burgundy or cult California Cabernet costing hundreds if not thousands of dollars. But when one of the dinner guests, a fellow named Chris Freemott, began talking about an $18 California Pinot Noir he'd recently tasted that was an "incredible value," I pulled up a chair. This was a wine I could actually afford. The name of the producer was unfamiliar to me: Cameron Hughes. "His Lot 142 Pinot Noir is amazing," Chris said.
When I got home, I went to the Cameron Hughes website (www.chwine.com). I found the Pinot Noir that Chris had mentioned along with other Lot wines that included Pinot Noirs, Chardonnays, Syrahs and Cabernets. Mr. Hughes says that nondisclosure agreements with wineries prevent him from naming his sources, and each wine was accompanied by a "Cameron Confidential" hinting at its exalted—yet unnameable—origin that necessitated a number instead a name. "We sourced this wine from the vineyard of a famous Cabernet producer," was the Cameron come-on for a $22 bottle. Another Cab was from "an $85-a-bottle program" in Napa's Atlas Peak appellation. There were videos of the boyishly handsome Mr. Hughes, including one in which he declared, "This wine had a five-page nondisclosure agreement attached to it." He was speaking of Lot 146 the 2006 Diamond Mountain District Cabernet—the first time I'd ever heard a wine described in terms of its legal pedigree rather than its aromas and flavors.
Of course, for cautious wine buyers this might pose a problem, particularly at a time of rampant wine fraud. Consumers have no way of knowing for sure if the sources of the wines are as Mr. Hughes has claimed, though when I consulted my friend Kim Landsman, a partner with the law firm Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler who specializes in intellectual property, he told me that misrepresenting facts about a wine would leave a broker subject to civil "and probably criminal" liability. I decided to investigate the facts for myself, so I ordered a case of Cameron Hughes's Lot wines—Chardonnays, Pinot Noirs, Syrahs and Cabernets—and I invited some wine-knowledgable friends over for a tasting.
We tried a wide range of wines and found the Cabernets particularly impressive: The 2007 Lot 164 Rutherford ($22) was lush and wonderfully aromatic and the 2007 Lot 143 Howell Mountain Cabernet, though a bit tight, was well structured. The 2006 Lot 146 Diamond Mountain Cabernet, meanwhile, was just monumental—rich, dense and substantial. There were also a couple of lovely Pinots (including the one that Chris Freemott liked) and a beautifully balanced 2007 Lot 135 Central Coast Syrah that cost an incredible $12 a bottle. In fact, with the exception of a mediocre Garnacha from Spain, it was clear that Mr. Hughes was getting good juice. But where was it coming from? I called up a few sources in the business to see what they knew.
Andrew Murray, a Santa Barbara, Calif.-based producer of prestigious Syrahs under an eponymous label that sell for up to $35 a bottle, was willing to go on the record as the producer of the Lot 135 Syrah. "Even though I make more expensive wines I feel cool about helping Cameron release an affordable wine," he said, adding that the Lot 135 had helped him keep his crew busy, his bottling line active and helped him economically.
Rob Lawson, a broker with the Napa Wine Company, a family-owned winery that sells its own wines as well as those of other wineries in the Valley and also serves as a custom crush facility, told me that he'd connected Mr. Hughes with some producers he knew that needed to sell wine. "There's great wine out there—wines that cost $20 to $30 a bottle that might have been in the $100 range a few years ago," he said.
David Ramey, who makes top wines in both Napa and Sonoma under the Ramey Wine label and has sold off bulk wine from time to time, doesn't see it that way. "No producer makes money selling bulk wine," he asserted. "A guy like Hughes has a business model that revolves around other people's misfortunes. He's like a vulture feeding on carrion."
When I caught up with Mr. Hughes himself on the phone, he had just returned home to San Francisco from a wine fair in Germany and would be leaving soon for Las Vegas. We made a date to meet for lunch in New York.
Mr. Hughes didn't look like a carrion-feeder. In fact, my first impression of him, when we met for lunch at Sparks Steak House was of a low-key, unpretentious fellow. I'd chosen Sparks as our luncheon destination as much for its wine list as the steaks. The former features lots of California Cabernet producers, some of whom I thought might be selling to Mr. Hughes. Perhaps I could get him to divulge a name or two. (There's a history of that sort of thing at Sparks, after all: It's where mafia don Paul Castellano got gunned down for telling mob secrets to the feds.)
Mr. Hughes grew up in Modesto, Calif., and his father was in the wine business, working in sales. He started his own wine brokerage business in October 2001. Mr. Hughes was remarkably cheerful even while narrating the painful early years of his wine brokerage company when he narrowly escaped bankruptcy and divorce. "By the summer of 2003 we were on life support," Mr. Hughes said matter-of-factly. "I owed hundreds of thousands of dollars to our backers, mostly friends of my father's," he added. It wasn't the right time and he didn't have the right wines ("a weird Cab-Merlot-Zin blend" was an early failure.) But Mr. Hughes made valuable connections and gradually learned about the underground pipeline of fine wine. "I met enough people to understand that there were small lots of high end wines available—wines that I could actually sell." And fortuitously for Mr. Hughes, the sea of excess wine was beginning to swell.
There were amateur vintners who had gotten in over their heads, spent too much money building new wineries, grape growers who had bigger crops than they could sell and Hughes was there with the cash to buy their wines. "We're like a bank," he said. "They won't make money on me but I give them the cash that they need." And soon enough, the business began to turn around. By January 2004, Mr. Hughes sold his first wine—a Syrah worth $27 that he priced at $8.99 and sold at the Costco San Francisco store himself. Mr. Hughes followed up with a $7.99 Zinfandel from a prestigious Dry Creek producer. He hired more sales people to sell his wines and eventually convinced winemaker Sam Spencer to join the company.
"Sam can taste through the thousands of tank samples or barrel samples and envision the finished wine." And he could tell if the wine that he and Mr. Hughes received turned out to be different from the wine that they had tasted and purchased, an important consideration—and a real fear—when buying bulk wine. Had they ever been fooled? "Once," said Mr. Hughes. "We had to turn a container of wine around and put it on a boat to China."
Just then his phone rang. Mr. Hughes looked at the number. It was a wine broker trying to close "a very big deal, about 10,000 gallons of wine," said Mr. Hughes, who estimated he "moves about 250,000 gallons of wine a year." The call was from "a really big name," Mr. Hughes said. "A name you would know."
"What about Screaming Eagle?" I asked of the legendarily hard-to-get Cabernet, the priciest on the list at $1,749.95 a bottle. "There's a guy who gets bulk wines from Screaming Eagle. No one knows who he is," Mr. Hughes said. Did he? Mr. Hughes shook his head. "No one does." (I later spoke with Andy Erickson, the Screaming Eagle winemaker, who confirmed that it "declassified" a certain amount of wine every year.)
Whether or not the Hughes business model is sustainable remains to be seen. The wine business goes in cycles, after all. Mr. Hughes said he hopes to "get closer to the ground" and buy his own vineyards one day. (And to be part of the next glut cycle?) In the meantime, unlike the hapless Paul Castellano, Mr. Hughes has managed to keep his mouth shut and produce some really good wines at prices that are almost too good to be true.
Oenofile
2007 Lot 135 Syrah Central Coast, $12
A great buy in a truly well-made and balanced Syrah. Notes of smoky bacon and spice in the nose, ripe fruit and refreshing acidity. It's made by Santa Barbara-based star Syrah producer Andrew Murray.
2006 Lot 146 Diamond Mountain Cabernet Sauvignon, $22
This was probably my favorite Lot Cabernet of them all; a densely rich but beautifully structured and supple wine. It also came with "one of the biggest NDAs I've ever seen," said Cameron Hughes.
2007 Lot 164 Rutherford Cabernet Sauvignon, $15
With its beguiling aromas of red fruit and spice, this soft, approachable Cabernet is more charming rather than substantial—a good everyday wine at a great everyday price.
2007 Lot 167
Napa Valley
Petite Sirah, $20
A dark and brooding wine, this Petite Sirah comes from a vineyard owned by a friend of winemaker Sam Spencer. It's immense in every way—including some very stiff tannins that softened by the second day.
2007 Lot 142 Carneros
Pinot Noir, $18
Mr. Hughes says that parts of this juicy, ripe full-bodied Pinot came from a famous vineyard in Carneros. It may not be complex, but it is certainly delicious.
Although Cameron Hughes bottles a wide variety of wines under his Lot Wine label, the Cabernets are particularly impressive. In addition to these wines, I'd suggest looking for Lots 143 and 140. A caveat: The imported Lot wines that I tasted were not of the same caliber as those from California.

[Moses Botbol]

I've tried one brand called like "90+ Wines" which is just the same bottle as the original with a general label. I picked up a Dr. Loosen Riesling for like $17, had the Loosen cork and all. Most of their stuff is California or Austrailia. Not much at all from Europe, but if you don't mind a "generic" label, buy these all day long if it's a wine you like.

I hope the glut is just temporary and does not deter the value of wines I have been storing, not that the US consumer is chasing the wines I like to invest in.

[Tom D.]

While there may be some nice wine that can be had from sites like this, at good prices, I have mixed emotions about it.

I fear a certain commoditization of wine here, and that goes against a lot of the things that have always made wine special for me. Not to overly romanticize the whole winemaker/terroir thing, but there is part of me that abhors drinking wine without feeling that connection. Feeling that I got a good bottle for a great price isn't enough.

But then I'm probably in the minority as I tend to drink wine mostly at special meals, or with friends, so I like to treat every bottle as at least a little special, even if it's not expensive. On those occasions, the wine almost always becomes a topic of at least brief discussion, and just being able to say "This is from Russian River fruit and it was a real bargain" doesn't seem like enough. But if I drank wine daily as a routine part of my day, I suppose it wouldn't matter, and in that case I can see sites like this as being potentially very attractive.

Too bad this current glut doesn't apply to well-aged Vintage Ports

[Michael Hann]

I find this sort of interesting. Where I see a problem is buying a bottle of this stuff for setting aside for maturing 10 years. I don't think I would do that with one of these wines, from a lack of knowledge of the wine in the bottle. I would only buy a bottle for pop n'pour purposes. On the other hand, I don't really like drinking 4 year old high quality cabernet sauvignon, too hard and tannic for my tastes. Pinot noir, maybe a different story.

[Eric Menchen]

David Ramey, who makes top wines in both Napa and Sonoma under the Ramey Wine label and has sold off bulk wine from time to time, doesn't see it that way. "No producer makes money selling bulk wine," he asserted. "A guy like Hughes has a business model that revolves around other people's misfortunes. He's like a vulture feeding on carrion."

No, the producers are not profiting from this like they would selling under their own high priced labels, but anyone who has taken a microeconomics class knows that even selling something you've already paid for at a loss is better than not selling it at all. And by going this route, they don't depreciate their label value.

[Moses Botbol]

I find this sort of interesting. Where I see a problem is buying a bottle of this stuff for setting aside for maturing 10 years. I don't think I would do that with one of these wines, from a lack of knowledge of the wine in the bottle. I would only buy a bottle for pop n'pour purposes. On the other hand, I don't really like drinking 4 year old high quality cabernet sauvignon, too hard and tannic for my tastes. Pinot noir, maybe a different story.

What if you knew what is in the bottle or tried one and just decided it had the moxie to age? You can write on the bottle what it really is or a neck tag for how long you want to wait until drinking it.

[Michael Hann]

I find this sort of interesting. Where I see a problem is buying a bottle of this stuff for setting aside for maturing 10 years. I don't think I would do that with one of these wines, from a lack of knowledge of the wine in the bottle. I would only buy a bottle for pop n'pour purposes. On the other hand, I don't really like drinking 4 year old high quality cabernet sauvignon, too hard and tannic for my tastes. Pinot noir, maybe a different story.

What if you knew what is in the bottle or tried one and just decided it had the moxie to age? You can write on the bottle what it really is or a neck tag for how long you want to wait until drinking it.

If I knew what was in the bottle, that would be a different story. But of course, except for the rare individual with an inside scoop, you don't know what is in the bottle, I assume. I suppose if I tried a bottle, liked it, and decided to buy a case I could establish an expectation in my mind for the aging of the wine and then try a bottle 2/3 of the way along to confirm my initial estimate. Thus, if I estimate it will reach its drinking window in 10 years, I might retry at 7 years. I can adjust going forwards, either drinking earlier, as originally estimated, or later, based on the 7 year test bottle.

The practice in Europe is to have a second label for selling juice you don't want to market under your premium label. Just because it is sold under the second label does not necessarily mean it is lower quality. In this case, it could be you want to sell the juice at a reduce price -- because of what you hope are transient disadvantageous market conditions -- without undercutting the customary pricing established for your top brand name. Would this not work? Robert Mondavi premium cuvee Cabernet Sauvignon selling at $35/bottle (contains the private reserve normally sold at ~ $140/bottle but which isn't moving in a poor market). Just as an example.

Oh, and don't get me wrong, I would try this if I found it. I am not a big buyer of wine -- I buy my wine in generally smaller quantities, not usually a case at a time. I'm just not sure I would buy a case like that, maybe I would.

[Moses Botbol]

I know with the 90+ brand wines, the local rep tells the liquor stores what it is, but they "aren't suppose to tell the consumer" as the regular label bottles will just stay on the shelves.