Why Ports over table wines?
Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil
Why Ports over table wines?
From reading posts over the past five years, it is not hard to come to the conclusion that lots of people on the two main Port forums consume copious quantities of Port ... more than likely as much if not more than table wines? What causes this phenomenon?
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
- Glenn E.
- Posts: 8363
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Port tastes better!
I don't drink wine or beer... just Port and the occasional fruity drink that comes with an umbrella. I guess I have a sweet tooth!
![Huh? [shrug.gif]](./images/smilies/shrug.gif)
I don't drink wine or beer... just Port and the occasional fruity drink that comes with an umbrella. I guess I have a sweet tooth!
Glenn Elliott
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:42 am
- Location: McKinney, TX, US
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Personally, I drink more table wine than Port. I associate a good table wine with eating a good dinner. I associate Port with cooler weather -- November through February -- and drinking either at the end of a meal (where a table wine has been consumed) or more likely while sitting at the table reading a book. Because Port is pretty strong, I don't tend to consume it very often -- maybe once a week during the peak season, maybe once every two weeks outside of that peak. Outside of November through February I may not drink any Port at all.
-
- Posts: 6664
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
- Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
I drink more table wine. I enjoy more Port.
- David Spriggs
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Dana Point, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Ha! I agree with that!Eric Menchen wrote:I drink more table wine. I enjoy more Port.
I've started drinking more tawny port as a starter before having wine. You can blame my trips to Portugal for that.
-
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:00 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
I probably drink 20 bottles of "table wine" vs. bottles of port. Frankly, there is more variety among the very limited types of table wines that I enjoy compared to the types of port that I enjoy. I like Northern Italian Reds; I like tawny ports. Maybe it's my limited tastes that restrict the kinds of wine I enjoy. Port has its own limitation: I can drink nearly twice as much table wine as port.
--Pete
(Sesquipedalian Man)
(Sesquipedalian Man)
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
I have to come in on the side of drinking more table wine than port (about ten to one). I always have the table wine with a meal and the port after dinner. I save the the port for family gatherings where it will be about 75% to 85% consumed. Lucky me I get the remainders. I throw out leftover table wine but drink leftover port. My satisfaction with leftover port drops drastically after a week so I don't open much just for myself unless it is a 375 ml bottle.
-
- Posts: 2743
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:07 am
- Location: Porto, Portugal
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
+1Eric Menchen wrote:I drink more table wine. I enjoy more Port.
Among the groups of folks I share passion of wine, I'm almost the only one who likes Port. Most of the time it is at the end of a meal when we had already too many wines!
When Port is most enjoyed at my table is when I receive folks and I choose the entire meal and wine selections.
Living the dream and now working for a Port company
- Andy Velebil
- Posts: 16797
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Cause it taste great
Realistically, it is because it's the one drink that I love the most. It also helps that I can enjoy a bottle over several days without major deterioration. Try leaving a bottle of decent wine open for several days and it usually doesn't taste very good, it seems to get this stale musty factor after a few days open, at least to me.

Realistically, it is because it's the one drink that I love the most. It also helps that I can enjoy a bottle over several days without major deterioration. Try leaving a bottle of decent wine open for several days and it usually doesn't taste very good, it seems to get this stale musty factor after a few days open, at least to me.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Here here! (UK parliament's phrase of choice). Port is more "reliable", wines have highs and lows just like port, but I get more "highs" with port and dare I say a few more frustrations with wine. I wonder if port is just a little more robust and flexible perhaps but I am not experienced enough to make a decision yet. Don't get me wrong I enjoy both but looking back there are more times when port has just sung and been more challenging.David Spriggs wrote:Hah! I agree with that!Eric Menchen wrote:I drink more table wine. I enjoy more Port.
I've started drinking more tawny port as a starter before having wine. You can blame my trips to Portugal for that.
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Although I've logged between 450 and 600 Ports/Madeiras on an annual basis, since 2005, I still believe my ratio of table wines to these two dessert wines is about 7 or 8:1.
Quite worrisome actually.
Quite worrisome actually.

Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
- Posts: 6020
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
I drink a lot more dry wine than port, but I will drink not so fancy table wines, but won't go for the equal in port. I put the lowest level port I'd drink much higher than the lowest level dry I wine. The ratio of wine to port for me is proabably 15 to 1. What I own as a collector is about 50% port
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
-
- Posts: 6664
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
- Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
As for what I own, it is about 80% Port.
- David Spriggs
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Dana Point, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Good for you!!!Eric Menchen wrote:As for what I own, it is about 80% Port.

Re: Why Ports over table wines?
David is currently in "drink down" mode ... so that when all of his table wines are consume, his cellar will then be just 100% Port and more to his liking! 

Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Counting only what I drink (as opposed to what I taste) I probably drink 6-8 times as much port as I do table wine. (But my wife is probably the opposite.)
I find that I prefer the intense and concentrated flavours in port over the flavours and structure you get in table wine. I compensate for the higher alcohol content by drinking smaller glass of port, usually a couple of 60ml glasses instead of a couple of 125ml glasses. Port is versatile enough to go with my evening meal and I'll carry on sipping through the evening. When it gets warm (like it finally has in the south of England) I just choose a port which is young and fruity and which tastes good when chilled.
All in all, I find port is much more versatile than table wine. And always remember, table wine is simply the contents of the lagar that someone forgot to fortify!
I find that I prefer the intense and concentrated flavours in port over the flavours and structure you get in table wine. I compensate for the higher alcohol content by drinking smaller glass of port, usually a couple of 60ml glasses instead of a couple of 125ml glasses. Port is versatile enough to go with my evening meal and I'll carry on sipping through the evening. When it gets warm (like it finally has in the south of England) I just choose a port which is young and fruity and which tastes good when chilled.
All in all, I find port is much more versatile than table wine. And always remember, table wine is simply the contents of the lagar that someone forgot to fortify!
-
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:38 pm
- Location: Montréal Canada
Re: Why Ports over table wines?
Rather worrisome indeedRoy Hersh wrote:Although I've logged between 450 and 600 Ports/Madeiras on an annual basis, since 2005, I still believe my ratio of table wines to these two dessert wines is about 7 or 8:1.
Quite worrisome actually.
![RUkidding? [shok.gif]](./images/smilies/shok.gif)
Rather perplexing

What do I know , I used to think port & peanut butter were a great match
![Huh? [shrug.gif]](./images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Vintage avant jeunesse/or the other way around . . .