1983 Ports at 30 years of age
Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil
-
- Posts: 6393
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
- Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA
Re: 1983 Ports at 30 years of age
I served a 1983 Taylor as part of a Taylor vertical. On its own it might surprise nicely, but compared to 1977, 1992, etc. it does show as an underperformer.
Re: 1983 Ports at 30 years of age
I recently did another 1983 horizontal tasting and the vast majority of fellow tasters, had Taylor in the 7th place of a total of 7 1983s in the lineup.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Re: 1983 Ports at 30 years of age
Roy Hersh wrote:Alex,
I had a nice run in the past 18 months in which I had 4 or 5 consecutive bottles of 1983 Cockburn's which were not corked. Then again, I changed my protocol after discovering that if TCA was not obvious immediately upon opening ... it typically took 4-5 hours in decanter for it to emerge. So I began to ignore decanting except for sediment and would serve pop and pour ONLY. Even this summer when Rupert popped a bottle of this, I told him about my findings and he was very happy that the bottle did not show any TCA and we enjoyed it immensely. For anyone that has tasted this 1983, it is about as good as any from this venerable vintage. Finding clean bottles is so crazy with the Cockburn's though, I'd never consider buying it again, once I open my last bottle which was from three original cases purchased back in the early 1990's at $19/ bottle.
Greetings ..as this is my first post. I, truthfully, was not aware of the corky reputation of Cockburn '83 so I decided to open one for a Valentine's Day dinner with the usual suspects. Andy, you know them all! Well, it WAS horribly corked and obvious immediately upon opening. I then opened a second bottle and it was gorgeous! These were both pristine bottles purchased on release and cellared correctly. Perfect labels and sealing plastic/wax. We paired it with a '83 Warre's which showed beautifully. There was no clear consensus as to the "winner" as both bottles shined.
- Andy Velebil
- Posts: 16644
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1983 Ports at 30 years of age
Marshall,M GELB wrote:Roy Hersh wrote:Alex,
I had a nice run in the past 18 months in which I had 4 or 5 consecutive bottles of 1983 Cockburn's which were not corked. Then again, I changed my protocol after discovering that if TCA was not obvious immediately upon opening ... it typically took 4-5 hours in decanter for it to emerge. So I began to ignore decanting except for sediment and would serve pop and pour ONLY. Even this summer when Rupert popped a bottle of this, I told him about my findings and he was very happy that the bottle did not show any TCA and we enjoyed it immensely. For anyone that has tasted this 1983, it is about as good as any from this venerable vintage. Finding clean bottles is so crazy with the Cockburn's though, I'd never consider buying it again, once I open my last bottle which was from three original cases purchased back in the early 1990's at $19/ bottle.
Greetings ..as this is my first post. I, truthfully, was not aware of the corky reputation of Cockburn '83 so I decided to open one for a Valentine's Day dinner with the usual suspects. Andy, you know them all! Well, it WAS horribly corked and obvious immediately upon opening. I then opened a second bottle and it was gorgeous! These were both pristine bottles purchased on release and cellared correctly. Perfect labels and sealing plastic/wax. We paired it with a '83 Warre's which showed beautifully. There was no clear consensus as to the "winner" as both bottles shined.
Welcome to the forum Sorry to hear about the corked bottle, but glad the second bottle showed wonderfully. When not corked, it is probably the best VP from 1983. And Warre's is also in top form from '83 as well.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com