Re: Dow tasting in NY March 19th
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:49 am
Excellent! Lamont has already posted his review... I'll get to mine ASAP.
I thought all of the Ports showed well. The 1980 was the monster I was expecting - it stands out in the pictures because it looks completely out of order in the age lineup. I had it as the 2nd or 3rd darkest, behind only the 2003 and about the same as the 2000 and 2007. The 2007 was served pop-n-pour by request of several attendees, and I think that hurt its ranking. It should have had 2 days decant time to really shine. A couple of others were under-decanted by a little bit but I don't think they were affected as much as the '07.
The concensus picked the 1970 as the POTN followed by the 1980 and then the 1960. I wasn't as impressed by the 1960 (or the '63 or '66 for that matter) and had the 1994 in second with the 1980 in third essentially tied with the 2007. My scores on the night ranged from 90 to 94, mostly in the 90-91 range.
We're already planning next year's event!
I thought all of the Ports showed well. The 1980 was the monster I was expecting - it stands out in the pictures because it looks completely out of order in the age lineup. I had it as the 2nd or 3rd darkest, behind only the 2003 and about the same as the 2000 and 2007. The 2007 was served pop-n-pour by request of several attendees, and I think that hurt its ranking. It should have had 2 days decant time to really shine. A couple of others were under-decanted by a little bit but I don't think they were affected as much as the '07.
The concensus picked the 1970 as the POTN followed by the 1980 and then the 1960. I wasn't as impressed by the 1960 (or the '63 or '66 for that matter) and had the 1994 in second with the 1980 in third essentially tied with the 2007. My scores on the night ranged from 90 to 94, mostly in the 90-91 range.
We're already planning next year's event!