Page 2 of 2

Re: Should "vintage port" be capitalized?

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:57 pm
by Glenn E.
Derek T. wrote:
Rob C. wrote:I … rarely capitalise it myself, especially when referring to vintage port as a general category that includes VPs that were never approved as "Vintage" Ports by IVDP/IVP.
Please name some so that we know what you are describing.
Rather obviously, anything that pre-dates the foundation of the IVP in... 1932?

Re: Should "vintage port" be capitalized?

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:07 pm
by Rob C.
Glenn E. wrote:
Derek T. wrote:
Rob C. wrote:I … rarely capitalise it myself, especially when referring to vintage port as a general category that includes VPs that were never approved as "Vintage" Ports by IVDP/IVP.
Please name some so that we know what you are describing.
Rather obviously, anything that pre-dates the foundation of the IVP in... 1932?
Yep.

It would also be interesting to know whether all the "undeclared" VPs produced over the years were approved by IVP/IVDP. I have seen reference to the fact that 2009 Cockburn Q d Canais was approved/registered, but how about those bottles of Cockburn 1966?

Re: Should "vintage port" be capitalized?

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:27 am
by Derek T.
I suggested to Jo that I should purchase a case of Noval Nacional 1931 from the household budget and capitalize it so that the expense could be written-off over the next 10 years.

The answer seems to be that vintage port cannot be capitalized :snooty:

Re: Should "vintage port" be capitalized?

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:57 pm
by Andy Velebil
Derek T. wrote:I suggested to Jo that I should purchase a case of Noval Nacional 1931 from the household budget and capitalize it so that the expense could be written-off over the next 10 years.

The answer seems to be that vintage port cannot be capitalized :snooty:
Not true, it can be, but only in direct relation to her shoes being capitalized :mrgreen:

Re: Should "vintage port" be capitalized?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:26 am
by Al B.
Perhaps the next question should be whether the cost of your port collection can be added to the cost of your mortgage / real estate bond?

Re: Should "vintage port" be capitalized?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:58 am
by Russ K
well, the bottle itself is probably an asset that can be capitalized, since it has future use / salvage value and is technically an asset. The juice however, is a consumable commodity, and can not. I would say the cork is a disposable consumable and therefore fits as an operating cost expense.

maybe if you buy it on Ebay where you are buying a "bottle" only, and the juice is worthless, you could capitalize the entire purchase for your bottle business! [shok.gif]
Russ

Re: Should "vintage port" be capitalized?

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:10 pm
by Roy Hersh
I had not checked in here for a couple of weeks and it is becoming clear that a significant number of people do feel that the words Vintage Port should have both words with capital letters. :scholar: