Fill levels
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 3:57 pm
This might be "port arcana" rather than "port basics" but here goes:
Last Friday I took receipt of a case of 1997 Dow and a case of 1983 Dow. I noticed one of the '97 Dow had a low fill level. I would call it "very low neck." I looked at the others and all of the 1997s had the same low fill. Just to compare, I looked at each of the 1983s and all of them had the high neck fill I consider normal.
There was no sign of any leakage, elevated cork, or anything odd about the 1997s. (other than that the original importer label on them had been removed and replaced with one from an importer in Tumwater, Washington, of all places. Tumwater! I think we used to go camping there in Boy Scouts).
I'm keeping the bottles and I'm not particularly worried about them, but they did make me curious about fill levels. Does anyone have any thoughts on what a normal fill level is, or what would account for a low level such as these? Is there any harm in such a low level, other than future regret for those extra ounces?
Thanks much,
Last Friday I took receipt of a case of 1997 Dow and a case of 1983 Dow. I noticed one of the '97 Dow had a low fill level. I would call it "very low neck." I looked at the others and all of the 1997s had the same low fill. Just to compare, I looked at each of the 1983s and all of them had the high neck fill I consider normal.
There was no sign of any leakage, elevated cork, or anything odd about the 1997s. (other than that the original importer label on them had been removed and replaced with one from an importer in Tumwater, Washington, of all places. Tumwater! I think we used to go camping there in Boy Scouts).
I'm keeping the bottles and I'm not particularly worried about them, but they did make me curious about fill levels. Does anyone have any thoughts on what a normal fill level is, or what would account for a low level such as these? Is there any harm in such a low level, other than future regret for those extra ounces?
Thanks much,