Grahm 10 year tawny
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:42 pm
Hi, this is my fourth post to your site.....Love it!
Im very new to the world of port wine and quickly becoming someone who drinks it quite often and really enjoys learning the subtle nuances that each port has to offer.
Anyways, I have tried 6 different ports to date, all in the last 3 weeks or so. Ive tried 2 very cheap rubys (Sandeman and presidential).....wasnt really impressed with them although they are extremely cheap ($10/bottle or so). Also tried 3 tawney ports.......1 cheap tawney made by sandeman, 1 10 year graham's and 1 20 year sandeman. the later 2 were a little more expensive ($30 ans $50 respectfully I believe). I really liked the Graham's 10 year better even though it was cheaper and Ive been told my many people just how wonderful the 20 year tawneys are. Also Ive tried a vintage port from 1996 by Quinta Do Vesuvio.....it was just ok.
Ok, my question is as follows: Of these that Ive tried, the 10 year Graham's Tawny was by far my favorite......fruity, sweet and easy to drink......and I found the 20 year sandeman a little bitter and with a little too much spirit and the 1996 vintage was just kind of bland. Are these typical observations of Graham's and Sandeman or is it typical of the age of the tawny?.....or am I crazy in my findings?
Also, How do Tawny ports and vintage ports typically compare in taste to eachother? I understand there are many variances here but Im just looking for basic characteristics of the types.
Thanks for the help!
Im very new to the world of port wine and quickly becoming someone who drinks it quite often and really enjoys learning the subtle nuances that each port has to offer.
Anyways, I have tried 6 different ports to date, all in the last 3 weeks or so. Ive tried 2 very cheap rubys (Sandeman and presidential).....wasnt really impressed with them although they are extremely cheap ($10/bottle or so). Also tried 3 tawney ports.......1 cheap tawney made by sandeman, 1 10 year graham's and 1 20 year sandeman. the later 2 were a little more expensive ($30 ans $50 respectfully I believe). I really liked the Graham's 10 year better even though it was cheaper and Ive been told my many people just how wonderful the 20 year tawneys are. Also Ive tried a vintage port from 1996 by Quinta Do Vesuvio.....it was just ok.
Ok, my question is as follows: Of these that Ive tried, the 10 year Graham's Tawny was by far my favorite......fruity, sweet and easy to drink......and I found the 20 year sandeman a little bitter and with a little too much spirit and the 1996 vintage was just kind of bland. Are these typical observations of Graham's and Sandeman or is it typical of the age of the tawny?.....or am I crazy in my findings?
Also, How do Tawny ports and vintage ports typically compare in taste to eachother? I understand there are many variances here but Im just looking for basic characteristics of the types.
Thanks for the help!