Biggest Port Disappointment You've Purchased?

Post by **Roy Hersh** » Tue May 17, 2011 4:38 pm

I hate starting a thread with a "negative" but this typically is something we can all relate to.

Whether high hopes, or expectations of a high priced bottle showing brilliance, or buying something as a bargain, we've all wound up with a bottle that stands out (maybe several bottles) as huge disappointments.

What is yours and what were the circumstances?

Marc J. · Post by **Marc J.** » Tue May 17, 2011 5:08 pm

The biggest Port disappointment in the recent past would probably be some 1972 Offley that I purchased a few months ago. I wasn't expensive, but there were absolutely zero redeeming qualities to this Port. None. Not one. I was expecting a rather one dimensional Port that was a bit past its peak - those lofty expectations weren't even met (not even close.) Oh well, live and learn...

Russ K · Post by **Russ K** » Tue May 17, 2011 6:10 pm

1977 Croft. just simply was past its prime...was the first 70''s bottle I had ever opened.

Lamont Huxley · Post by **Lamont Huxley** » Tue May 17, 2011 9:40 pm

That's an easy one - a bottle of 1970 Burmester VP that I bought a few years ago. I know that Burmester isn't necessarily known for their VPs, but I expected at least a pleasant, fully mature port and it turned out to be way over the hill and barely drinkable. If I hadn't spend such a nice chunk of change on it I probably would have poured most of it down the drain.

That being said, I think it's pretty remarkable how rarely I've been disappointed in my port purchases over the years. As far as the great wines of the world go, I still don't think there's a better overall price/quality ratio out there.

Here's to PORT!

Tom D. · Post by **Tom D.** » Wed May 18, 2011 8:46 am

In my case, it's not any particular purchase, but a particular Port that has frustrated me. I've opened four bottles of 1963 Taylor in the past few years, all purchased from different sources and all looking great. Upon drinking, all four were badly corked or otherwise seriously flawed. I'm starting to think this is one great wine I am just destined to never get to enjoy

Jeff G. · Post by **Jeff G.** » Wed May 18, 2011 9:10 am

83 Noval Nacional

dom carter · Post by **dom carter** » Wed May 18, 2011 12:20 pm

1975 Noval VP

David Spriggs · Post by **David Spriggs** » Wed May 18, 2011 11:54 pm

Well... other than the seemingly endless stream of corked ports from 1977, I would have to say that it was a Port I bought many many years ago. I wanted something special, and it was at a moment's notice. I went to this liquor store and bought a 1977 Warre's. It was very expensive (I think it was $100 and this was probably around 1990). Yes, I know, a silly price. The wine was so dead. I don't know what had happened to it, but it was a HUGE disappointment. All alcohol and no fruit.

SEAN C. · Post by **SEAN C.** » Thu May 19, 2011 2:36 am

The two cases of 1985 Croft I used to own, either this Port is just not good or my two cases happened to not be good.

Moses Botbol · Post by **Moses Botbol** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:54 am

1985 Hoopers VP. Wanna trade?

Post by **Andy Velebil** » Thu May 19, 2011 7:23 am

Marc J. wrote:The biggest Port disappointment in the recent past would probably be some 1972 Offley that I purchased a few months ago. I wasn't expensive, but there were absolutely zero redeeming qualities to this Port. None. Not one. I was expecting a rather one dimensional Port that was a bit past its peak - those lofty expectations weren't even met (not even close.) Oh well, live and learn...

Yeap, had this once too and that was more than enough.

Al B. · Post by **Al B.** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:14 pm

My greatest disappointment is the same as Sean's - I'm pretty tolerant of VA, but not even I could drink either of the two bottles of Croft 85 I bought. I've never bought it since, despite a number of chances to do so.

Anders · Post by **Anders** » Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:03 am

Romariz colheita 66.... It was the top taste of the evening... but everybody was disapointed, not worth the money

David Spriggs · Post by **David Spriggs** » Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:25 pm

1975 Taylor. Just a very weak port for Taylor.

Post by **Roy Hersh** » Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:39 pm

A tie between 1963 Quinta do Noval and 1983 Taylor for me.

Post by **Andy Velebil** » Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:33 pm

Another one for me is 1980 Fonseca VP. Every wine producer is entitled to an off year...

Richard Henderson · Post by **Richard Henderson** » Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:55 pm

The Broadbent 1994 produced by Bartholomew Broadbent and bottled by Dick Nierpoort was one of my disappointments. It is a good vintage year, great pedigree of port producers/experts and maybe an 83 rated wine. Totally unbalanced, below average port.

Shawn Denkler · Post by **Shawn Denkler** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am

Interesting how 1972 Offley has been mentioned as the biggest disappointment in port. I bought nine bottles in the late 70's or early 80's because they were on sale and quite cheap. They were quite nice for an off year. I remember them having good fruit and structure when young.

Post by **Andy Velebil** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:33 pm

Shawn Denkler wrote:Interesting how 1972 Offley has been mentioned as the biggest disappointment in port. I bought nine bottles in the late 70's or early 80's because they were on sale and quite cheap. They were quite nice for an off year. I remember them having good fruit and structure when young.

I guess time hasn't been kind to it lol.

Kurt Wieneke · Post by **Kurt Wieneke** » Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:31 am

Here are a few disappointments and trust me I have nothing against this house.

1970 Warre's - nothing really there, way below expectation; bought from a Fort Worth establishment; could have been cooked at some point during it's travel
1990 Warre's LBV - dark, cloying and one dimensional; could have been shut down
1976 Warre's Colheita - nutty and sickly sweet with tons of protruding spirit

For The Love Of Port