Received wisdom - another myth?
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:32 am
It is rare for anyone to write a reference book on any particular subject based solely on the results of their own first hand research and experimentation.
The writer, learns facts (or copies them from elsewhere) and incorporates them into his or her work without personally checking them.
From this was borne the many myths and legends of history..
- and today...
Over the last year I have established that almost all the published advice on decanting times is complete baloney - that most VP's need much more time in decanter than is generally advised, and keep much longer than is sometimes suggested as well.
Well, here's another bit of repeated wisdom that I'm beginning to have doubts about:
'Tawnies and filtered LBV's do not improve with age after bottling'
Over the last couple of weeks I've worked my way through a bottle of 10yr Warre that was bottled in 1986.
This was markedly better than my experiance of a 10yr Otima a few months back.
Dropped standards? - or bottle maturation? It's hard to know for sure.
I have just opened a 1982 Graham LBV.
Bottled with a stopper, and from a shipper that as far as I know has never dabbled with unfiltered LBV.
I decanted the bottle, although this should not have been necessary, to reveal a fair amount of sediment. This is not the first time I have spied significant sediment in an old bottle of a filtered wine.
After 3 hours the wine is light and spiritous, with a colour that is not unlike some '75 VP's. Aside from the spirit, which is a little aggressive to both nose and palate, it is smooth and shows it's age. Hopefully the spirit will blow off.
Was this wine like this 20 years ago? No chance.
Was it better then? I very much doubt it.
Food for thought!
Tom
The writer, learns facts (or copies them from elsewhere) and incorporates them into his or her work without personally checking them.
From this was borne the many myths and legends of history..
- and today...
Over the last year I have established that almost all the published advice on decanting times is complete baloney - that most VP's need much more time in decanter than is generally advised, and keep much longer than is sometimes suggested as well.
Well, here's another bit of repeated wisdom that I'm beginning to have doubts about:
'Tawnies and filtered LBV's do not improve with age after bottling'
Over the last couple of weeks I've worked my way through a bottle of 10yr Warre that was bottled in 1986.
This was markedly better than my experiance of a 10yr Otima a few months back.
Dropped standards? - or bottle maturation? It's hard to know for sure.
I have just opened a 1982 Graham LBV.
Bottled with a stopper, and from a shipper that as far as I know has never dabbled with unfiltered LBV.
I decanted the bottle, although this should not have been necessary, to reveal a fair amount of sediment. This is not the first time I have spied significant sediment in an old bottle of a filtered wine.
After 3 hours the wine is light and spiritous, with a colour that is not unlike some '75 VP's. Aside from the spirit, which is a little aggressive to both nose and palate, it is smooth and shows it's age. Hopefully the spirit will blow off.
Was this wine like this 20 years ago? No chance.
Was it better then? I very much doubt it.
Food for thought!
Tom