Estimating the longevity of declared and undeclared vintages
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:20 am
There is allegedly a tradition of laying down a pipe of port for a newborn. Now that is no way to encourage responsible drinking -- even if you use the traditional Queen Anne pipe of 126 wine gallons, that is 630 bottles -- but a case does seem like a good idea. And I have grandchildren born in 2000 and 2004.
In a good year like 2000, my understanding is that any of Roy's top two tiers of port producers will be able to blend a wine capable of lasting 30 to 40 years. But some will be fading then, while others will go on to 50 or even 80 years. Is there any way of estimating which will last, so that my granddaughter can continue drinking a bottle on special occasions well into middle age?
In an undeclared year like 2004, I can well understand that there might not be the raw material needed to blend a long lasting port. What is the longevity history of the single quinta wines and junior blends produced in these years?
Would I be helped in a quest for longevity by laying down magnums?
In a good year like 2000, my understanding is that any of Roy's top two tiers of port producers will be able to blend a wine capable of lasting 30 to 40 years. But some will be fading then, while others will go on to 50 or even 80 years. Is there any way of estimating which will last, so that my granddaughter can continue drinking a bottle on special occasions well into middle age?
In an undeclared year like 2004, I can well understand that there might not be the raw material needed to blend a long lasting port. What is the longevity history of the single quinta wines and junior blends produced in these years?
Would I be helped in a quest for longevity by laying down magnums?