'66 dreams vs. '65 purchase
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:55 am
Hey all, amazing community you've got here. I'm interested in the thoughts of the further-initiated...
I've always liked Port. That is, until I had the '66 Messias Colheita. It was an awakening, a redefinition of what taste could be. Now I love port.
Drama aside, it's also how I came the realization that I must own a bottle for myself. I knew this particular '66 would be incredibly hard to find locally.I knew I'd have to settle - but I'm wondering if I may have settled too much. I ended up with a '65 Kopke Colheita which I'm sure is great in its own right but, after finding this site, I realize it was sold to me under a few misconceptions by my local expert wine seller (not sarcasm,they're good, but the level of expertise on this site blows them away on this subject).
The main thing I'm concerned with is that the '66 is such a notable year in the port world. They told me that '65 would be "about the same" - from what I've read from all of you is that this isn't the case. Maybe a minor note but this is the first time I've spent this kind of money on a bottle ($180cdn) and I didn't really want to take a shortcut. Plus, the nostalgia of the '66 changing how I look at port has to be worth something, right?
I guess my question is, if this happened to you dedicated folks, would you return it and chase the '66 or should I just be happy with what I ended up with? I think I'm mostly bothered by the "misrepresentation" (strong word) that '65 was as an amazing year as any other.
Thanks for your thoughts!
Chris
I've always liked Port. That is, until I had the '66 Messias Colheita. It was an awakening, a redefinition of what taste could be. Now I love port.
Drama aside, it's also how I came the realization that I must own a bottle for myself. I knew this particular '66 would be incredibly hard to find locally.I knew I'd have to settle - but I'm wondering if I may have settled too much. I ended up with a '65 Kopke Colheita which I'm sure is great in its own right but, after finding this site, I realize it was sold to me under a few misconceptions by my local expert wine seller (not sarcasm,they're good, but the level of expertise on this site blows them away on this subject).
The main thing I'm concerned with is that the '66 is such a notable year in the port world. They told me that '65 would be "about the same" - from what I've read from all of you is that this isn't the case. Maybe a minor note but this is the first time I've spent this kind of money on a bottle ($180cdn) and I didn't really want to take a shortcut. Plus, the nostalgia of the '66 changing how I look at port has to be worth something, right?
I guess my question is, if this happened to you dedicated folks, would you return it and chase the '66 or should I just be happy with what I ended up with? I think I'm mostly bothered by the "misrepresentation" (strong word) that '65 was as an amazing year as any other.
Thanks for your thoughts!
Chris