Happy New Year to all
![Toast [cheers.gif]](./images/smilies/cheers.gif)
Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil
Fascinating, I was reading recently (in one of Decanters recent back page "legend" wine articles I think) where it was implied that the house was amiss in missing a few major declarations in that era, such as '77. This puts that in a whole new light.Roy Hersh wrote:I believe this still remains the number one selling Port worldwide. It was for many years, don't know that it has changed. Absolutely huge and worthy of not declaring the 1977 VP in order to get the product launched, finally, in the UK which made all the difference in the world.
Ah, that would have been the article about the Cockburn 1947. I read that article with interest. Although Cockburn did not release the 1977 vintage (or the 1966) they did make and bottle it and bottles do occasionally crop up at tastings or on the secondary market.Bradley Bogdan wrote:Fascinating, I was reading recently (in one of Decanters recent back page "legend" wine articles I think) where it was implied that the house was amiss in missing a few major declarations in that era, such as '77. This puts that in a whole new light.Roy Hersh wrote:I believe this still remains the number one selling Port worldwide. It was for many years, don't know that it has changed. Absolutely huge and worthy of not declaring the 1977 VP in order to get the product launched, finally, in the UK which made all the difference in the world.
That would explain another book referencing a Cockburn '77. My first thought reading the article, though, was "that's the best picture you can come up with??" Haha. I know a lot of older wines wind up with facsimile labels at some point, but at least find one that's legible for your full page picture!Al B. wrote:Ah, that would have been the article about the Cockburn 1947. I read that article with interest. Although Cockburn did not release the 1977 vintage (or the 1966) they did make and bottle it and bottles do occasionally crop up at tastings or on the secondary market.Bradley Bogdan wrote:Fascinating, I was reading recently (in one of Decanters recent back page "legend" wine articles I think) where it was implied that the house was amiss in missing a few major declarations in that era, such as '77. This puts that in a whole new light.Roy Hersh wrote:I believe this still remains the number one selling Port worldwide. It was for many years, don't know that it has changed. Absolutely huge and worthy of not declaring the 1977 VP in order to get the product launched, finally, in the UK which made all the difference in the world.