Seen at Costco
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:36 pm
1863 Taylor "Single Harvest" Tawny . This is the lowest price in the world!


Forum for Port, Madeira & Portuguese Wines
https://www.fortheloveofport.com/ftlopforum/
https://www.fortheloveofport.com/ftlopforum/viewtopic.php?t=39079
Uhhhh... no. But I can pick it up for you tonight!Andy Velebil wrote:Well, did you buy it?
If you've got a discount coupon for 1/2 off I'll think about it.David Spriggs wrote:Uhhhh... no. But I can pick it up for you tonight!Andy Velebil wrote:Well, did you buy it?
-Dave-
Yes, Port easily holds up for that long. Scion, and the other ultra-old Tawny Ports that have been released over the last few years, are amazing Ports.A dschus wrote:"also for the fact that, after 155 years of ageing in cask, the wine is in perfect condition."
Will port hold up for this long? I imagine it would be vinegary and overly oxidized.
That one? Never, since I don't own it. I just posed with it.Allan Engelsted Laurents wrote:And lucky Eric for showing the box....When will You ever open that Taylor?
While acetobacter turns alcohol into acetic acid to make vinegar, it can't live in a high alcohol environment to start. It's alcohol tolerance is around 18%, whereas Port is at 20%. And even that 18% isn't a happy place for acetobacter. If you want to easily make vinegar, you dilute your wine down to 5-7%. Temperature is also a factor, with acetobacter working best in the 70-110F range, which is above the preferred temperature for a wine cellar.A dschus wrote:Will port hold up for this long? I imagine it would be vinegary and overly oxidized.
Eric Menchen wrote:That one? Never, since I don't own it. I just posed with it.Allan Engelsted Laurents wrote:And lucky Eric for showing the box....When will You ever open that Taylor?
While similar, the decanters are different. So that would also lead me to think this was the 1863 as well. Unless there was a decanter shape change.David Spriggs wrote:I believe that this is the 1863 (152 years old) and not the Scion (160 years old). This was formerly the 1863 Krohn, which I have tasted out of barrel. Amazing stuff!
I thought the 1863 was only sold in a 2-pack with the 1896?Andy Velebil wrote:While similar, the decanters are different. So that would also lead me to think this was the 1863 as well. Unless there was a decanter shape change.David Spriggs wrote:I believe that this is the 1863 (152 years old) and not the Scion (160 years old). This was formerly the 1863 Krohn, which I have tasted out of barrel. Amazing stuff!
EDIT: a quick google check of decanters...this is the 1863 and NOT Scion.
IIRC that was prior to the sale.Glenn E. wrote:I thought the 1863 was only sold in a 2-pack with the 1896?Andy Velebil wrote:While similar, the decanters are different. So that would also lead me to think this was the 1863 as well. Unless there was a decanter shape change.David Spriggs wrote:I believe that this is the 1863 (152 years old) and not the Scion (160 years old). This was formerly the 1863 Krohn, which I have tasted out of barrel. Amazing stuff!
EDIT: a quick google check of decanters...this is the 1863 and NOT Scion.
Or was that only when they were still Krohns?
at least yours sells it at all. in PA all wine and liquor is sold in state-run stores [we're just starting to get wine and beer in the big chain of grocery stores, and only in their higher end stores]. so no port from Costco or Trader Joe.Bradley Bogdan wrote:Ugh, my Costco only has one tawny, the Graham's 10 year. I can't wait until I move back to civilization...