Page 1 of 3

Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:58 am
by Moses Botbol
Per Andy... moved to a new thread


Which one would you choose out of the generally best modern Fonseca's:

1970 Fonseca
1985 Fonseca
1994 Fonseca
2011 Fonseca

One could be an overall pick, one could be a near or distance future drinking pick, but add some detail your reason. The price spread between them is not huge, so it is valid...

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:28 pm
by Roy Hersh
For current drinking, 1970 ... although a bottle of 1966 blew everyone away. But the 1970 is a perennial winner.

I would likely take the 1985 above the 1994, and definitely above the 2011 for several reasons, but even the 1985 needs a lot more time.

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 3:11 pm
by Moses Botbol
Roy Hersh wrote:For current drinking, 1970 ... although a bottle of 1966 blew everyone away. But the 1970 is a perennial winner.

I would likely take the 1985 above the 1994, and definitely above the 2011 for several reasons, but even the 1985 needs a lot more time.
I am the same order as you...

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:15 pm
by Eric Menchen
But you omitted the 100 point 1977 ;-)

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:33 am
by Phil W
The '70 for me, and agree with Roy's assessment of the other vintages. I had the '70 fifteen years ago, and the '85 does not yet seem to me to be at the same point that the '70 was then.

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:29 am
by John M.
Moses Botbol wrote:Per Andy... moved to a new thread


Which one would you choose out of the generally best modern Fonseca's:

1970 Fonseca
1985 Fonseca
1994 Fonseca
2011 Fonseca

One could be an overall pick, one could be a near or distance future drinking pick, but add some detail your reason. The price spread between them is not huge, so it is valid...
I think we need a Fonseca Vertical to find out!

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:38 am
by Moses Botbol
John M. wrote:
Moses Botbol wrote:Per Andy... moved to a new thread


Which one would you choose out of the generally best modern Fonseca's:

1970 Fonseca
1985 Fonseca
1994 Fonseca
2011 Fonseca

One could be an overall pick, one could be a near or distance future drinking pick, but add some detail your reason. The price spread between them is not huge, so it is valid...
I think we need a Fonseca Vertical to find out!
'94 is as new I would go (with hesitation) on a Fonseca vertical. Drinking ports that aren't ready is of little interest for me. '42 - '85 would be neat.

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:49 am
by Bradley Bogdan
Moses Botbol wrote:
John M. wrote:
Moses Botbol wrote:Per Andy... moved to a new thread


Which one would you choose out of the generally best modern Fonseca's:

1970 Fonseca
1985 Fonseca
1994 Fonseca
2011 Fonseca

One could be an overall pick, one could be a near or distance future drinking pick, but add some detail your reason. The price spread between them is not huge, so it is valid...
I think we need a Fonseca Vertical to find out!
'94 is as new I would go (with hesitation) on a Fonseca vertical. Drinking ports that aren't ready is of little interest for me. '42 - '85 would be neat.


I'd bump it up to '95 as that's a Port that's in a great spot right now. But I agree for the younger stuff, no need.

If I could arrange a location in TX near enough to one of the big cities early next year, would folks be interested in a vertical?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkz. U

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:57 am
by John M.
Moses in in Boston, I'm in NJ. So likely in the NE---such as NYC.

Moses--this is your baby, you want to take this on?

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:36 pm
by Andy Velebil
Not easy as they are all great in their own way.

First I'd go with the 1970, simply as it's the most mature and a wonderful VP.

Then it comes down to 1994 or 1985. Given the 1994 probably won't be mature for another 20+ years I have to go with the 1985. That still isn't mature but will be a little closer to it by the time I die.

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:14 pm
by Eric Menchen
Bradley Bogdan wrote:I'd bump it up to '95 as that's a Port that's in a great spot right now. But I agree for the younger stuff, no need.

If I could arrange a location in TX near enough to one of the big cities early next year, would folks be interested in a vertical?
At a Taylor vertical a few years ago we had a bunch of their SQVPs. For Fonseca you could throw in Q.d. Panascal and Guimaraens, in which case I would allow the 1998. It is more ready.

I'd be up for Texas, but I'd prefer Austin-S.A. area. You're probably thinking Houston or DFW? East coast can work too.

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:16 pm
by Moses Botbol
John M. wrote:Moses in in Boston, I'm in NJ. So likely in the NE---such as NYC.

Moses--this is your baby, you want to take this on?
Only if in Boston. I know a couple that have deep vintages of Fonseca as well.

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:02 pm
by Glenn E.
Andy Velebil wrote:Not easy as they are all great in their own way.

First I'd go with the 1970, simply as it's the most mature and a wonderful VP.

Then it comes down to 1994 or 1985. Given the 1994 probably won't be mature for another 20+ years I have to go with the 1985. That still isn't mature but will be a little closer to it by the time I die.
+1

They're all great, but only the 1970 is mature right now. The 1985 is close, and is deceptively easy to drink, but it really needs a good 10 more years.

1994 and 2011... measured in decades. I'll probably get to taste some mature 1994 some time after I retire. 2011 is iffy unless I live to be 90! :lol:

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 6:19 am
by Bradley Bogdan
Eric Menchen wrote:
Bradley Bogdan wrote:I'd bump it up to '95 as that's a Port that's in a great spot right now. But I agree for the younger stuff, no need.

If I could arrange a location in TX near enough to one of the big cities early next year, would folks be interested in a vertical?
At a Taylor vertical a few years ago we had a bunch of their SQVPs. For Fonseca you could throw in Q.d. Panascal and Guimaraens, in which case I would allow the 1998. It is more ready.

I'd be up for Texas, but I'd prefer Austin-S.A. area. You're probably thinking Houston or DFW? East coast can work too.
I'm equidistant from Austin and Houston here in College Station, Dallas is a bit farther but still very reasonable for me. I'd probably be able to make any of the three cities work to host.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkz. U

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 6:19 am
by Bradley Bogdan
I'd also be up to swing up to Boston as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkz. U

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 9:25 am
by Edgar B.
I'm in for a Fonseca vertical if it goes back several years from 1970 :yumyum: . Texas or East coast is fine w/me.

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 9:32 pm
by Ronald Wortel
The 1970 is one of my all time favourite ports, so that's an easy pick. That said, the '85 is not far behind...
Roy Hersh wrote: definitely above the 2011 for several reasons
Now I'm curious, what are those reasons?

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:40 am
by Glenn E.
I could probably make a trip to the East coast for a Fonseca vertical! :)

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:41 am
by John M.
Love Boston---It's More than a Feeling. [dance2.gif]

I would make every effort to come!

Re: Favorite Recent Fonseca

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:01 am
by Moses Botbol
Well we could work on doing something in Boston. Could be grand or light hearted. I could host 6-10 people and figure 1.5 bottles per person... I have enough glasses.

Al I think I have for Fonseca off hand is '77 and '85... Dow could be fun too.