1985 Grahams
Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 4:58 pm
- Location: Vancouver BC
1985 Grahams
1985 Grahams Port – this was excellent, still dark with clear edges, sweet walnut and fig in the nose plus a faint hint of allspice, and on palate it seemed less sweet (translation – better balance or acidity?) than many Grahams Ports. Good length and without the heat one often sees. Good show. As someone said, ‘If you don’t like this wine, you just don’t like Port!”
- Glenn E.
- Posts: 8354
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Grahams
One of my favorite Vintage Ports, and in my top 3 for the entire decade of the 1980s (along with '85 Fonseca and '87 Vargellas).
Glenn Elliott
Re: 1985 Grahams
I adore this vintage port
. For me it is the best mature port at the moment from the 80's (So I exclude the F85 since it is nowhere near the same maturation as the G85)
![YIKES! [yahoo.gif]](./images/smilies/yahoo.gif)
- David Spriggs
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Dana Point, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Grahams
It's great to see a good tasting note on this wine. It is stupendous. I have seen other tasting notes that are not a good showing. But I tend to believe that there was bad storage or a bad cork involved with those. All of my bottles have been wonderful!
-
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:55 pm
- Location: In the middle of cornfields & cow pastures, PA
Re: 1985 Grahams
I have several bottles of this but haven't tried it yet. I do have the Fonseca '85 which I've tried and loved. Thankfully, I have several bottles of that left. Recently I acquired a bottle of the '87 Vargellas and I'm trying to decide when I should have it.
"I have often thought that the aim of Port is to give you a good and durable hangover, so that during the next day you should be reminded of the splendid occasion the night before." - Hungarian/British journalist & author George Mikes
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 4:58 pm
- Location: Vancouver BC
Re: 1985 Grahams
Vargellas can be a long lived wine. I had my last bottle of the 1967 late last year and it was excellent.
For some reason I didn't buy the 85 Fonseca, but I did get in on the 94 (and I still have some 63 in the cellar). Nice long lived Ports.
For some reason I didn't buy the 85 Fonseca, but I did get in on the 94 (and I still have some 63 in the cellar). Nice long lived Ports.
- Glenn E.
- Posts: 8354
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Grahams
No rush. Like the F85, the TV87 has decades ahead of it.Mike J. W. wrote:Recently I acquired a bottle of the '87 Vargellas and I'm trying to decide when I should have it.
Glenn Elliott
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:56 am
- Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Re: 1985 Grahams
Hey Bill,
Was that my bottle? I really enjoyed that one! If I recall correctly the decant time on that bottle was about 6 hours at cellar temp.
Cheers,
Blair
Was that my bottle? I really enjoyed that one! If I recall correctly the decant time on that bottle was about 6 hours at cellar temp.
Cheers,
Blair
Cheers, B.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 4:58 pm
- Location: Vancouver BC
Re: 1985 Grahams
Blair Curtis wrote:Hey Bill,
Was that my bottle? I really enjoyed that one! If I recall correctly the decant time on that bottle was about 6 hours at cellar temp.
Cheers,
Blair
It was indeed, Blair and a great bottle it was!