#1: What is your favorite vintage of Graham's VP?
Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:11 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States of America - USA
Beginning with the 1945, there is no vintage of Graham's I have not had at least 4x. From 1955 on, that number at least doubles except for the 1991 which I have only had a handful of times. I really love Graham's from what you will see here (just in case some newbies might not have seen this before): http://www.fortheloveofport.com/index.p ... &Itemid=67
If I had only ONE to choose from though, it would have to be the 1970 which not only drinks well today, but has done so every single time I've had it ... plus it will continue to drink extraordinarily well for many years to come.
If I had only ONE to choose from though, it would have to be the 1970 which not only drinks well today, but has done so every single time I've had it ... plus it will continue to drink extraordinarily well for many years to come.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
I will admit having consumed more 1970 VP than any other vintage, regardless of what appears in my TN data base. I would have to say that 1977 would be second in that regard, especially with all of the Warre's, Taylor and Fonseca I have had.
However, for a modern vintage Moses, it would be extremely hard to ignore 1994 overall, (not for Graham's though) even above and beyond the 1970. Which I would choose to drink today would be an entirely different matter and you'd then be spot on.
However, for a modern vintage Moses, it would be extremely hard to ignore 1994 overall, (not for Graham's though) even above and beyond the 1970. Which I would choose to drink today would be an entirely different matter and you'd then be spot on.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:45 pm
- Location: New Plymouth, New Zealand
Always enjoyable, the '55 has been a VP that I admire greatly. I slightly prefer the '55 Sandeman and the Noval and Cockburn's also are in the same level too. The 1955 Croft, Taylor, Dow and Fonseca are always welcome at my table too. In 2007, I participated in a total of 8 bottles of 1955 although most have not been written up at this point. I need to stop traveling and do more writing. But then again, that is always the connundrum.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
- Posts: 2022
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:59 am
- Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
-
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
For New Year's we had a bottle of 1908 Grahams and 1970 Grahams. I can see why Roy picks the 1970 Graham as the best, but the 1908 is a true stand out. TN's will be out soon, but I am now going with 1908 as my favorite Graham's vintage.Moses Botbol wrote: I'm going with: 1985 and 1955
It's hard to pick a single vintage with Grahams, the more vintages I try, the harder it is to pick one.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
-
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
-
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA