1980 Fonseca Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16644
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

1980 Fonseca Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

I've had almost every vintage of Fonseca from the 70's and 80's, yet for some reason I had never had this one. So I thought it would be a good time to give it a go and see how it is.

Decanted about 6-8 hours. A very advanced color for a VP, far to advanced for an 80 from a top tier house such as Fonseca. It was boardering on being a ten year tawny in color. I was a bit worried straight off when I smelled it and got tons of heat with only light flower pedals and some toffee evident. This is an incredibly hot VP, fully laiden with unintegrated spirit. It was as if the fruit died out a long time ago and left only the arguardente. Other than a medicinal taste the only other thing I could gather was some light carmel. The finish was totally clipped and left me wondering what happened to Fonseca in 80 and 83? The bottle was in pristine shape and well stored, so that was not an issue. Alex R. said he's had two of these and they were identical to this one. I must say a bottle I will never buy again, even at a great price. 81 points

08/21/08
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Jan-Tore Egge
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Lillehammer, Norway

Re: 1980 Fonseca Vintage Port

Post by Jan-Tore Egge »

Sounds very much like how I perceived it when I drank it four years ago. And I would like to repeat the question: what's the story behind Fonseca under-performance in 80-83?
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16644
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1980 Fonseca Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

Jan-Tore Egge wrote:Sounds very much like how I perceived it when I drank it four years ago. And I would like to repeat the question: what's the story behind Fonseca under-performance in 80-83?
And Taylor's sub par in 1983 also....I'd love to know as all I have is my own theories.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Post Reply