French Vins Doux Naturel and Spanish Vinos Dulces
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:10 pm
I've been wanting to learn more about French Vins Doux Naturel and similar Spanish wines. I've had a few very young Grenache-based Banyuls, Maury, and Rasteau wines, and a Mourvedre-based Monastrell Dulce. All of these were done in a young, concentrated, low-tannin, fruit-forward style that I enjoyed very much. (As an aside, I think its a fortified style California could pull off well if they didn't concentrate their efforts into faking their way through "Port".) Very different from a Ruby/Vintage Port style, but quite enjoyable in its own way. Of these, I most enjoyed the Clos du Pauliles "Rimage" Banyuls and the Bodegas Olivares Monastrell Dulce.
I also had a small pour of a 1948 Banyuls (I forgot the name of the winemaker, unfortunately). This was also quite nice, with added complexity from age, but strong on fruit nevertheless. It was notably lighter on tannin than the few aged Vintage Ports I've had, however, and hence, lacking in the flavor of well-aged tannin that you'd get from a Vintage Port.
I know French fortifieds come in a variety of different appellations and styles. They seem to be mainly divided into Grenache-based wines (Banyuls, Maury, Rasteau, and Rivesaltes - and perhaps others?), and various Muscat-based wines (such as Muscat de Frontignon) which I've never tried at all.
Except for the 1948 Banyuls, all of my experience with these wines has been with Grenache-based fortifieds in an extremely young "Rimage" style. I know there are "Grand Cru" and "Rancio" styles which are more aged, but I know next to nothing about the different grades and aging of Vins Doux Naturel - can anybody explain more about this?
Are Muscat-based Vins Doux Naturel ever aged beyond a young style? (I have the same question about Spanish Grenache- and Mourvedre-based Vinos Dulces.)
Also, from my experience with the young "Rimage" styles of Banyuls, Maury, and Rasteau, they have a very similar style. As one gets into older wines, are wines from these appellations more distinctive from one another?
Finally, if you have personal recommendations of French and Spanish fortifieds that you really like, I'd love to know more.
Thanks in advance,
Peter
I also had a small pour of a 1948 Banyuls (I forgot the name of the winemaker, unfortunately). This was also quite nice, with added complexity from age, but strong on fruit nevertheless. It was notably lighter on tannin than the few aged Vintage Ports I've had, however, and hence, lacking in the flavor of well-aged tannin that you'd get from a Vintage Port.
I know French fortifieds come in a variety of different appellations and styles. They seem to be mainly divided into Grenache-based wines (Banyuls, Maury, Rasteau, and Rivesaltes - and perhaps others?), and various Muscat-based wines (such as Muscat de Frontignon) which I've never tried at all.
Except for the 1948 Banyuls, all of my experience with these wines has been with Grenache-based fortifieds in an extremely young "Rimage" style. I know there are "Grand Cru" and "Rancio" styles which are more aged, but I know next to nothing about the different grades and aging of Vins Doux Naturel - can anybody explain more about this?
Are Muscat-based Vins Doux Naturel ever aged beyond a young style? (I have the same question about Spanish Grenache- and Mourvedre-based Vinos Dulces.)
Also, from my experience with the young "Rimage" styles of Banyuls, Maury, and Rasteau, they have a very similar style. As one gets into older wines, are wines from these appellations more distinctive from one another?
Finally, if you have personal recommendations of French and Spanish fortifieds that you really like, I'd love to know more.
Thanks in advance,
Peter