What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

This section is for those who have basics questions about, or are new to, Port. There are no "dumb" questions here - just those wanting to learn more!

Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21829
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

Post by Roy Hersh »

Key word = buying. Many of us have held a 6 liter bottle of VP in Gaia. That obviously does not count.

I am sure some have experienced some old heavier weight glass used for Port too. I know we'll have some wise guys with large formats, but this is really about 750s. [cheers.gif]
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8383
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

Post by Glenn E. »

My 1970 Royal Oporto bottles seem to be rather thick and heavy, but I doubt that the difference between them and a "normal" bottle would be more than an ounce or two. I'd weigh one to find out, but unfortunately I don't think I have a scale that precise that can handle ~3 lbs.
Glenn Elliott
Peter W. Meek
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: SE Michigan

Re: What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

Post by Peter W. Meek »

Here are some sample weights full or empty in grams.
From this, I think we can assume that the loss of density due to
alcohol vs water is made up almost identically by the weight of
the sugars and solids in port (748g vs 750g).

The heaviest bottle was the TF 20year (655g) by a half ounce
over the American fortified wine bottle from Justin (640g).
The lightest bottle was the Warre's 1994 at 561g (~3.5 oz less)

When were bottles used that were enough heavier that a
person could tell by the heft in hand (rather than by weighing
on a sensitive scale)?

House-----Type------------Year------Empty-----Full------Contents
================================================================
Croft-----vp----------------1960-------624-----
Justin----Obtuse-(fw)-----1998-----------------1380
Niepoort--colhieta--------1991-----------------1355
Niepoort--colhieta--------1991-----------------1358
Noval-----20y--------------------------596------
TF--------20y----------------------------------1395
TF--------40y---------------------------613------
TF--------vp----------------1966-------601------
TF--------vp---------------1977-----------------1337
TF--------vp---------------1977-----------------1353
Warre-----Nimrod-------------------------------1340
Warre-----Nimrod-------------------------------1340
Warre-----Nimrod-------------------------------1341
Warre-----Nimrod-------------------------------1341
Warre-----vp--------------1963-------606------
Warre-----vp--------------1966-------593------
Warre-----vp--------------1983----------------1359
Warre-----vp--------------1991-------587------
Warre-----vp--------------1994----------------1311
============================================================
Average-->----------------------------603-----1351-------748

(Sorry about all the hyphens; trying to keep the columns straight.)
--Pete
(Sesquipedalian Man)
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6679
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

Post by Eric Menchen »

Peter W. Meek wrote:When were bottles used that were enough heavier that a person could tell by the heft in hand (rather than by weighing on a sensitive scale)?
I don't know the answer to this, but I'm reminded that I can feel the difference between a returnable 12 oz. beer bottle and the non-returnable kind.
Peter W. Meek
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: SE Michigan

Re: What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

Post by Peter W. Meek »

The same is true of the old 6 oz refillable Coke bottles and the current 8 oz glass nostalgia bottles: the "real" ones are a lot heavier. Not so noticeable when they are full, since the new ones have an extra 2 oz of Coke.
--Pete
(Sesquipedalian Man)
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16813
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

Post by Andy Velebil »

Peter

Thanks for that, it's quite interesting to see the results. Doesn't seem to be a whole lot of variation, at least compared to some Cali dry wine bottles that empty are heavier than a full bottle.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Peter W. Meek
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: SE Michigan

Re: What is the heaviest bottle of Port you can remember buying?

Post by Peter W. Meek »

Andy Velebil wrote:...some Cali dry wine bottles that empty are heavier than a full bottle.
(heh)

I missed my chance to be the king of empty bottle weights. Right before I saw this post, I had just taken 173 empties to the recycling center. (Mostly Italian. The accumulation since early July.)
--Pete
(Sesquipedalian Man)
Post Reply