Page 1 of 1
The Wall Street Journal's TOP 9 of 2009 .. includes 1 VP
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:27 pm
by Roy Hersh
Coincidentally and sadly, after a decade of wine journalism, the husband and wife team
(DOROTHY J. GAITER AND JOHN BRECHER) who've penned their nearly 600 columns are done reporting for the WSJ with this very last article. They give a year end report with their most delicious wine finds. There was one Portuguese wine amongst them ... and it just so happened to be a Vintage Port.
Enjoy the read:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... %3Darticle
Re: The Wall Street Journal's TOP 9 of 2009 .. includes 1 VP
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:26 pm
by Peter W. Meek
This is very sad; I will probably let my WSJ subscription lapse.
Re: The Wall Street Journal's TOP 9 of 2009 .. includes 1 VP
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:10 pm
by Eric Menchen
Sweet! The wine pick that is. I'm not a big Graham's fan, but one of my local b&m's had the 2003 on sale for $40 a while back and I picked up a bunch.
A nice closing column, and sad to see it end.
Re: The Wall Street Journal's TOP 9 of 2009 .. includes 1 VP
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:40 pm
by Andy Velebil
Eric Menchen wrote: I'm not a big Graham's fan,.
Sorry for a bit of thread drift, but may I ask how come? We all have our likes and dislikes, I was just curious as to what yours was?
Re: The Wall Street Journal's TOP 9 of 2009 .. includes 1 VP
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:52 pm
by Eric Menchen
Andy Velebil wrote:Eric Menchen wrote: I'm not a big Graham's fan,.
Sorry for a bit of thread drift, but may I ask how come?
Now there's a difficult question. The easy answer would be that it is too sweet, but I don't think that works because I like plenty of
very sweet dessert wines. I've think I've had eight different vintages of Graham's, and the 1985 and 1983 multiple times and while they were all nice, none has really knocked my socks off. I wouldn't turn any down if you offered it, and I still picked up some of the 2003 to try; but given a choice between Graham's and most other brands, I'll chose the others. Checking my notes, in one I wrote, "Too simple." In another I note that the Graham's was my least favorite of a flight. The 1963 was pretty good, but I felt all in that flight were less exciting than I had hoped. I did find the 1983 to be pretty tasty, but still preferred Smith Woodhouse from that year.
Re: The Wall Street Journal's TOP 9 of 2009 .. includes 1 VP
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:14 pm
by Andy Velebil
Thanks for the candid answer. Everyone has houses they like more than others, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Re: The Wall Street Journal's TOP 9 of 2009 .. includes 1 VP
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:42 am
by Moses Botbol
Andy Velebil wrote:Thanks for the candid answer. Everyone has houses they like more than others, and there is nothing wrong with that.
I can't think of brand I do not like.