1983 Cockburn Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
Richard Henderson
Posts: 693
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:21 pm
Location: fort worth, Texas, United States of America - USA

1983 Cockburn Vintage Port

Post by Richard Henderson »

After hearing of so many corked botles of this much maligned vintage of Cockburn, the beloved and I decided to open a bottle last night as it is our anniversary month and 1983 is our year. We cannot recall ever having a corked bottle of 1983 Cockburn so we were apprehensive. The cork pulled cleanly and the cork itself smelled of good old VP. We poured small glasses and I got the chocolaty spicey dark fruit nose. The mouth entry was smooth and nice palate coating. Reminds me of those raspberry infused dark chocolate truffles. Nice finish. Hints of nutmeg. This is the distinctive style that I like about Cockburn's and remember from ordering it in pubs in the UK. I keep thinking that I am going to smell wet dog soggy cardboard. Never happened. After 14 hours of decanting it is still very smooth.
We pondered the bad luck so many have had and we recall buying most if not all from The Rare Wine Compnay of California. Maybe we have not had any bad bottles because this particualr shipment came from a well bottled few cases?
I also question if I could distnguish a corked port. I remember tasting corked port in the past. We opened two bottles in succession before the port last night of corked Chardonnay including a 2000 Kistler. I think I know what I am doing.

I just wonder if it is corked and I can't tell?

I give it 91 points.
Richard Henderson
Jim R.
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:33 pm
Location: Boulder Creek, CA, USA

Re: 1983 Cockburn

Post by Jim R. »

Richard

I last had this port in March 2002. It was great. Thick and rich nose of plums and currants. Some raisin in the nose/taste, excellent body and clean flavors with definite tannins present, great sweetness. Luckily I have a few left to enjoy!

Jim
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16828
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1983 Cockburn

Post by Andy Velebil »

Richard,
I'm glad this bottle showed well for you, as I've had my fair share of bad bottles. When not corked this is a great VP, probably the best '83 has to offer. I know Cockburn's long-time winemaker has stated there was a major issue with bad corks in this vintage. And what is strange is, in my experience, it generally doesn't show mustiness right away. But about 4-5 hours later it all of a sudden has this major change and the TCA all of a sudden becomes very pronounced and continues to do so the longer it sits in decanter. I guess that's a testament to how powerful a good bottle can be.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Richard Henderson
Posts: 693
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:21 pm
Location: fort worth, Texas, United States of America - USA

Re: 1983 Cockburn

Post by Richard Henderson »

After overnight decanting, a little pleasant heat has appeared but still plenty of rich spice and dark fruit. Two days later it still is a nice drink but starting to fade. No sign of the dreaded corkiness. Why do some bottles get it and others do not?
Richard Henderson
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21849
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Re: 1983 Cockburn

Post by Roy Hersh »

Simply put, because some bottles wind up with good corks and others come from batches where TCA has tainted those corks.

I love hearing the theory on the 4-5 hour range on the TCA setting in. A unique perspective. :wink:
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Post Reply