Decanted 20 hours. Purchased within the past few months for $18.
Label clearly states unfiltered and will throw sediment after a time--yet it has a T-cork which is puzzling (or at least against the convention I've usually seen). Very little sediment at all.
Very dark magenta color; I wasn't getting a lot of nose but what I got was berrylike with a hint of earthiness. The taste has hints of mashed dark, sweet berries. A bit tannic/acidic with the short to moderate finish being a bit clipped. Good but otherwise average LBV--but at price a decent value.
Two thoughts: Wonder how this would be after 2-3 days (since it was shared with 4 others at a cook-out party there is none left today) or in the alternative, it might be better if aged a few years. Just felt like this was opened prematurely or needed more time to breathe.
90 Points
2005 Fonseca LBV Port
Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil
2005 Fonseca LBV Port
Any Port in a storm!
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:50 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Re: 2005 Fonseca LBV
John,
Many LBVs will improve in bottle, especially those with a bit more stuffing. Unfiltered LBVs and those that see only 4 or 5 years in cask as opposed to those with the maximum 6 years are generally the ones that will show improvement over time. Your Fonseca was unfiltered so that says something, but when was it bottled?
Mahmoud.
Many LBVs will improve in bottle, especially those with a bit more stuffing. Unfiltered LBVs and those that see only 4 or 5 years in cask as opposed to those with the maximum 6 years are generally the ones that will show improvement over time. Your Fonseca was unfiltered so that says something, but when was it bottled?
Mahmoud.